No. A softfork is consensus valid meaning any new blocks are...

JackTheMimic

npub1m50e65pv09ga73lglrkjgh5tlgj006pv9rce8xdg7rn5kps38gssh2glzq

hex

0000006b4a05d600370f88599667cf3383bb777529acb4a738b1dd8800243145

nevent

nevent1qqsqqqqqdd9qt4sqxu8cskvkvl8n8qamwa6jnt955uutrhvgqqjrz3gprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsd68ua2qk8j5wlgl503mfyt69l5f8haqkz3uvnnx50pe6tqcgn5ggd5avhe

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-17T18:45:14Z

↳ 回复 00000206... (npub1qqqqypnst2u7wdlmexad9gjamstlg7c4ck2w4cadv4j5xd5e8vvsupryz3)

I don't get the "80% abstained" argument. Wouldn't "nay" votes take the form of sticking with the status quo and doing nothing? Isn't that the path of...

No. A softfork is consensus valid meaning any new blocks are accepted by status quo nodes. If they rejected those version 4 bit blocks, THAT would be signaling "nay". Usually you would have to run a URSF client or accept the new stricter rules.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "0000006b4a05d600370f88599667cf3383bb777529acb4a738b1dd8800243145",
  "pubkey": "dd1f9d502c7951df47e8f8ed245e8bfa24f7e82c28f19399a8f0e74b06113a21",
  "created_at": 1786992314,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "7f0fd320f990e2ae3f3eb2dd9fcfb0cc56c4e77f277cca40af2f71cf4fa18f51",
      "wss://wot.utxo.one/",
      "root",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "000081d697aee719d446acaf271c92062fc9aa188431206757ad68f96a3b2cb9",
      "wss://nostrelites.org/",
      "",
      "74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "f0a79304a75c8c352663e050c3f5d6a76a6ec40e0941b88009c710ffb2fdea7b",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "reply",
      "00000206705ab9e737fbc9bad2a25ddc17f47b15c594eae3ad65654336993b19"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
      "wss://nostr.wine/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "74ffc51cc30150cf79b6cb316d3a15cf332ab29a38fec9eb484ab1551d6d1856",
      "wss://nostr.wine/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb",
      "wss://wot.utxo.one/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "00000206705ab9e737fbc9bad2a25ddc17f47b15c594eae3ad65654336993b19",
      "wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ],
    [
      "nonce",
      "3003ei",
      "21"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "No. A softfork is consensus valid meaning any new blocks are accepted by status quo nodes. If they rejected those version 4 bit blocks, THAT would be signaling \"nay\". Usually you would have to run a URSF client or accept the new stricter rules.",
  "sig": "acbcd3d1b4573c4ab16f521dfd44b202e95e34ab08f37a3eac638cb1e1546d17be1e8ae0a9fe6f02b02b3c2ba4dae5a623d1725c616390e4e998682ed075622a"
}