https://blossom-espelhator.girino.org/a23b21e48d99fd0d5143c1...

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "000001e9897535adc46a1d90c2a50bccbea210f0ba66f1b007b39fbd30d4ce3c",
  "pubkey": "3ffac3a6c859eaaa8cdddb2c7002a6e10b33efeb92d025b14ead6f8a2d656657",
  "created_at": 1780144845,
  "tags": [
    [
      "nude_detector",
      "https://blossom-espelhator.girino.org/a23b21e48d99fd0d5143c192d31f762d14e33440f50ec27da2a67b7eea7489e0.mp4  0.0"
    ],
    [
      "nonce",
      "739429",
      "20"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "https://blossom-espelhator.girino.org/a23b21e48d99fd0d5143c192d31f762d14e33440f50ec27da2a67b7eea7489e0.mp4\n\nMost people spend 15 to 30 years paying off a house believing that one day it will finally be theirs. But under property taxation, ownership never truly becomes unconditional. Even after the mortgage is gone, the payments to the state never stop, and if those payments stop, the threat of losing the property still remains.\n\nThat is not true ownership. That is conditional possession.\n\nA free society should never allow families to lose homes they already paid for because they failed to keep paying an ongoing tax bill forever. The Tyler v. Hennepin County ruling helped end one major abuse by preventing governments from keeping surplus equity after tax foreclosures, but the deeper issue still exists. Governments can still seize homes, force sales, displace families, and remove people from property they supposedly “own.”\n\nProperty taxes fundamentally change the relationship between individuals and property rights. Instead of ownership being absolute, it becomes dependent on continuous compliance with the state. Your ability to remain in your home is no longer secured purely by purchase and peaceful possession. It remains contingent on perpetual payments and political systems you never explicitly consented to.\n\nThis especially harms retirees, lower income families, and people living on fixed incomes. A person can spend decades building equity, maintaining a home, improving a community, and paying off debt, only to still face the possibility of losing everything over rising tax burdens they can no longer afford.\n\nSupporters call this “public funding,” but structurally it functions as ongoing leverage over property holders. If nonpayment can ultimately result in confiscation, then the state retains superior claim authority over the property itself.\n\nReal ownership should mean that once you buy something peacefully and honestly, it belongs to you. Permanently. Not until the next tax bill arrives.\n\nThis is one of the clearest examples of how statism transforms ownership into dependency.\n\nSource: https://web.facebook.com/reel/969086956091291",
  "sig": "bb0249f39cd1ade22f31fc1efa366dab24de10b842e4acc80a162177dc6f1c171c8f6102389551f962b32ea185d76d3cde34a94bc9ea3522f9a4be8d6a1fa675"
}