Some points on how i'm mapping nostr and how I orient my wor...

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "00000565aac8bc2b14df2faf3f594349ef0876daabd968866c16aa1c06fa9bec",
  "pubkey": "dc4cd086cd7ce5b1832adf4fdd1211289880d2c7e295bcb0e684c01acee77c06",
  "created_at": 1788807584,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "83a31b9a9dc95500fb6334fc3fe04c5d1ce25a2f8b20da19dbc494f9afabdd73",
      "wss://spatia-arcana.com/",
      "root",
      "3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d",
      "wss://pyramid.fiatjaf.com/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ],
    [
      "nonce",
      "1003fo",
      "21"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Some points on how i'm mapping nostr and how I orient my work around:\n\nMy perception is that nostr enables the full spectrum of interaction. You can have no gatekeeping at the cost of the worst potentials for digital social interaction, the capability of having the most curated social interaction, and everything in between. The free association and costless exit across that spectrum almost maps directly to the irl social environments we've historically been a part of, minus the constraints of distance and travel time.\n\nAt the most open nostr - something Amethyst's global approximates, no constraints, full network, outbox, kind 1 - there are no guarantees, and it will always be an average of everything that happens at smaller scales. Trying to force any behavior here is like trying to force an \"average\" behavior on the physical world.\n\nThe smaller communities is where we can focus on for change, even in the developer-nostr space (develop with the people you want to associate with).\n\nEnabling the most differentiation will necessarily lead to the most wide variety of content at the global level. Analagous to how a wide proliferation of local tribes makes global culture widely differentiated, vs \"globalization\" as an averaging/smoothing of cultures on the world through the scaling of efficiency and production. \n\nAll centralization is mass production and ease of transmission/communication - anything with an identity is this average behavior.\n\nPure \u0026 flat decentralization is still an average,  mandated \"decentralization\" is just centralized power imposed externally. But communities with walls to guard them can develop their own identities outside of mass appeal. \n\nSo we can have centralization at the smallest relay scale, and larger. Just like any \"organic\" system has cells, tissues, organs, organisms, ecosystems, and the transport of needed information/resources between them. You can get some of this behavior on other platforms, but they're always mediated by a larger authority, on their terms. Which means platforms are always imposing an average and will always have the final say on what happens, socially and technically. That centralizes not only what is possible, but it what is even \"thinkable\".",
  "sig": "aafc6828d0f394642c20b46f6b94a31062ab1746350794b158a6e9c64bc1b2269bbef2b266ae0f6044031a639bdac41d66aa2647201b5949a261b66b81724386"
}