🫡

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "0000cc85f1271b7dbdb3be3d7c8b67f8af8813d3bdf4a9d19e4bf927359cd24d",
  "pubkey": "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
  "created_at": 1781194160,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "be54404a1586b4218edcd6cefb84d3d8e7901168133b0c2ca08d3943a9956cc1",
      "wss://nos.lol",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "97c70a44366a6535c145b333f973ea86dfdc2d7a99da618c40c64705ad98e322"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "catallax"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "dlists"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "wot"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Wisp"
    ],
    [
      "nonce",
      "158056",
      "16"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "🫡\narbiters can choose to set a fee, and users can choose to use their service or select someone else.  \ncurators (on https://grantless.org ) don't really exist at the #catallax protocol level - they're more of a ui/ux feature, supplied by #dlists and #WoT . there's nothing stopping an aspiring curator from using catallax to build out their curation service for a fee.  \nall these raw materials are available for innovative people ta build markets and economies on top of. this is why the protocol is deliberately unopinionated and the current clients are billed as \"reference\". i'd like to see others build opinionated systems on top",
  "sig": "a0d0822b66b20871a100bd7c539b27f86ebc04e0d93583781dfe451768e293d8fc3f5aad4c9c2f57d2d9039c3d5efef65a86cef8dd362baad519bb9a39eb1df7"
}