Am I understanding this right that the anti-spam deposit wil...

Schroedinger

npub1y8q62fgx5dpaztp5czjrfa7xek38dfsfaeg6pgp9x0lt7ryylvaqshcjy8

hex

0008b9b50b911b845e897cdc847ae6f98ffc9dcc3188dd2fa7f973269aa4aa01

nevent

nevent1qqsqqz9ek59ezxuyt6yhehyy0tn0nrlunhxrrzxa97nljuexn2j25qgprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgszrsd9y5r2xs739s6vpfp57lrvmgnk5cy7u5dq5qjn8l4lpjz0kwsn4pn9y

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-03-24T17:08:13Z

↳ 回复 Cyph3rp9nk (npub1lnms53w04qt742qnhxag5d6awy7nz6055flnmjkr6jg39hm86dlq7arrnt)

Eigenwallet 4.0 Protocol: Add possibility for maker to require an "anti-spam deposit". The deposit is a part of the Bitcoin refund which the maker ma...

Am I understanding this right that the anti-spam deposit will certainly be unlocked if the swap is successful? Or does it purely depend on the makers mercy, or is the mercy part just in case the taker is behaving bad?

Im curios what you think about the fact that the taker has always the same btc address.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "0008b9b50b911b845e897cdc847ae6f98ffc9dcc3188dd2fa7f973269aa4aa01",
  "pubkey": "21c1a52506a343d12c34c0a434f7c6cda276a609ee51a0a02533febf0c84fb3a",
  "created_at": 1774372093,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "9d9f21265653ff7edbea3cf668e726c13aceb18df8a9b6cb8a125ca24d3ddd11",
      "wss://nos.lol",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "fcf70a45cfa817eaa813b9ba8a375d713d3169f4a27f3dcac3d49112df67d37e"
    ],
    [
      "nonce",
      "403",
      "10"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Am I understanding this right that the anti-spam deposit will certainly be unlocked if the swap is successful? Or does it purely depend on the makers mercy, or is the mercy part just in case the taker is behaving bad?\n\nIm curios what you think about the fact that the taker has always the same btc address.",
  "sig": "5b9b4626617c30fa7b90811dc4d5e7770f4ee96a9f1642ba51c732ef8236ba4786757ff2c20532b06b3aa159b7531db0a13f3941fbab126f30fe9a0e784f6249"
}