If we look at historic cycles and assume the records about t...

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "049e905bef7fbd80894f927180c2e9009428399395aa4a537abff3992c2ab3dc",
  "pubkey": "4f170d8af9f783e1fe6b6ac8a97b94fef633402eea931933d788ab305e8ef636",
  "created_at": 1778503438,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "1e5592ccbb7dbb662dbeecdc4c6e8396960bf180a1d05f1ec9deec66df471e42",
      "",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "7f5224f3c556965c704a0388313da557b9eb69b3c49ee0e1adf12e6e1f8a54ce",
      "",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "b8a9df8218084e490d888342a9d488b7cf0fb20b1a19b963becd68ed6ab5cbbd"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "4f170d8af9f783e1fe6b6ac8a97b94fef633402eea931933d788ab305e8ef636"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "13920044db03a19c6dbefef4e8d52c7d6fa75663c67311af3735db0b201545ad"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Primal Web"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "If we look at historic cycles and assume the records about them are accurate, we see a pattern of behavior emerge which can be modelled and predicted.\n\nHuman nature never changes. It locks in the cycle.\n\nIf we look around, it's abundantly clear that we are certainly not in the expansion phase of the cycle. That was last century. So we know we are somewhere after that. \n\nCivilizations peak and sustain for a while after expansion stops. It's not a sine wave type of function. It's more of a phase transition function.\n\nFor example, civilizations don't grow, sustain for a brief period, and then steadily decline. They expand rapidly, sustain, and then suddenly collapse. It may take 200 years to expand, but the collapse only takes a decade. The Roman empire is an excellent example, and Martin Armstrong has written tomes on historical examples of the civilization cycle.\n\nThe point is, we know it's a cycle, it's not linear, and it's not symmetrical. We cannot halt or reverse the cycle because that would require a fundamental change in human nature. the best we can do is influence the trend, and in this case, engineer a controlled collapse.\n\nIt appears this is what the controlling class is attempting to do. The whole Great Economic Reset thing from the WEF is clearly an attempt to navigate the collapse phase so that they retain continuity of power into the next cycle. They are clear it's not a restart, or a reboot, or a reorder. Words are very important. It's a reset, meaning the old is gone forever and is replaced with something entirely new. The language they use in relation to their reset reinforces this. And their goal is 2030.\n\nThat is just one globalist plan of many which are addressing a major shift in how humanity exists and functions, and the others have a similar target timeframe.\n\nNow let's perform a differential analysis by observing what is Not happening.\n\nIf the West was in expansion phase, or was about to experience a major step up in growth, then investment would be going into preparing the infrastructure to accommodate this growth. but the opposite is happening.\n\nBridges, highways, rail systems, buildings... all are falling into such poor disrepair that many are no longer salvageable. Lots of talk about huge expansions in green energy, datacenters etc, but zero action or even talk about obtaining the huge amount of resources like Copper which are essential for the infrastructure.\n\nThis apparently short sighted and foolish lack of planning and build out makes sense when the folks running the show know that it won't be needed.\n\nDid you know that during the covid lockdowns, over 2 million shipping containers vanished globally? While all the stores were shut, rail was hailing like crazy. Where and what were they hauling? Nobody can say.\nA plausible theory I have heard is that all those shipping containers went underground while the world was watching Netflix.",
  "sig": "140259b56ac0a88d8756dfdc2f7eecb83422071313b4395538ea46fdcf4d22d7c71aefe50204ed7b1db72df258f12049f1ead9a7767b573bcc826ffa34803191"
}