Plain NIP-17 on its own isn’t a good fit for Jumble, because...

Cody

npub1syjmjy0dp62dhccq3g97fr87tngvpvzey08llyt6ul58m2zqpzps9wf6wl

hex

2175065891fb60ace1ce696947152e14c28a3c819a083df7608dd1eb62d17b59

nevent

nevent1qqszzagxtzglkc9vu88xj628z5hpfs528jqe5zpa7asgm50tvtghkkgprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsgzfdez8ksa9xmuvqg5zly3nl9e5xqkpvj8nllj9aw06ra4pqq3qcjs3qrf

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-04-02T02:39:06Z

↳ Reply to Flowey (npub1a4w0mqh90cxhn7nc3qnygvk367mdmh0rv9sk527n9tv9xt6jdy2sh5cxw0)

At the moment, is it still alone with NIP-4E? Will the junction with the NIP-17 come later?

Plain NIP-17 on its own isn’t a good fit for Jumble, because many Jumble users rely on bunker remote signers, and the experience would be pretty poor.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "2175065891fb60ace1ce696947152e14c28a3c819a083df7608dd1eb62d17b59",
  "pubkey": "8125b911ed0e94dbe3008a0be48cfe5cd0c0b05923cfff917ae7e87da8400883",
  "created_at": 1775097546,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "d2e49536be059f74c0bd29054f9a8108945a89e31298db99036d6dc9d44fb1c4",
      "wss://pyramid.fiatjaf.com/",
      "root",
      "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "49e8a300877670faa71c49d234e79b1405804c9827ea0b8991f44539d45091bb",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "reply",
      "ed5cfd82e57e0d79fa7888264432d1d7b6dddde361616a2bd32ad8532f526915"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "ed5cfd82e57e0d79fa7888264432d1d7b6dddde361616a2bd32ad8532f526915"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "jumble"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Plain NIP-17 on its own isn’t a good fit for Jumble, because many Jumble users rely on bunker remote signers, and the experience would be pretty poor.",
  "sig": "bcd829a8c1fcb7b1e5289aa99771dfdf0338c19c865f79695a42e8bdd91cf77d6225cf6337ca66dfaf527b1cac528b18cf45ddd40e1f31a6cd61431b7451f6c4"
}