yeah, you correctly articulated our misalignment.

Neal BIP110

npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6

hex

27857d902138414480efd99bb8c47d0b06a2c47c7394b6914afeba54e37bd4de

nevent

nevent1qqsz0ptajqsnss2ysrhanxacc37skp4zc378899kj990awj5udaafhsprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsr3gwdr05shx5f35jpthqsrhcgwrc4kuh2y0xmpt0647kgp5p06zghys7ux

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-03-13T21:19:14Z

↳ 回复 3c4f5156... (npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh)

I think the place where we are still misaligned is that you are continuing to treat Bitcoin as one more bounded model we constructed, whereas the clai...

yeah, you correctly articulated our misalignment.

which i have always aspired to be able to do with my friends: to pinpoint an exact premise we go different ways with.

i, like nostr:nprofile1qqsvgd5v2yh8pcm9trapv7t8e4eleqag4yr75w9na45rtr7tm74smfsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7zefp8q pointed out, think there is a circularity of reason which contradicts itself in thinking truth is a byproduct of an empirical instantiation.

But i’m compelled by the Thomistic arguments that act has primacy to potency, form to matter, the immaterial to the material.

if i were not, then i would probably agree with you 🤣 🤜🤛

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "27857d902138414480efd99bb8c47d0b06a2c47c7394b6914afeba54e37bd4de",
  "pubkey": "38a1cd1be90b9a898d2415dc101df0870f15b72ea23cdb0adfaafac80d02fd09",
  "created_at": 1773436754,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "bd13b1942ffa796ed653e371bff46a745d30f0c7d1a92c27edbcc51dfc8317ab",
      "",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "f9d07af1b4c37402c76c6054a7e93f05ceb233a8770bf3ba6969fd843390e5a6",
      "",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "6618ebdefc8df12d4e1fb6423bf8f96c3ef4bbb3c389d13ca5966e1cb5cc5922",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "3c4f51561243524f307ed2ee272c7cf4a782404fbe3a176606043b6ad427ee77",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "c4368c512e70e36558fa167967cd73fc83a8a907ea38b3ed68358fcbdfab0da6",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "mention"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "yeah, you correctly articulated our misalignment. \n\nwhich i have always aspired to be able to do with my friends: to pinpoint an exact premise we go different ways with. \n\ni, like nostr:nprofile1qqsvgd5v2yh8pcm9trapv7t8e4eleqag4yr75w9na45rtr7tm74smfsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7zefp8q pointed out, think there is a circularity of reason which contradicts itself in thinking truth is a byproduct of an empirical instantiation.\n\nBut i’m compelled by the Thomistic arguments that act has primacy to potency, form to matter, the immaterial to the material. \n\nif i were not, then i would probably agree with you 🤣 \n🤜🤛",
  "sig": "70b72d0c512bb2d95c29e624a4ab2f4cd2c6f07128aaab0a004b80fd2807aa11797554577dbe6dc1e841bac2b378c272b1191bf261f594dd018ff618eaf3dc60"
}