Was the code free to copy and use? No.

0d97beae567fcec9...

npub1pktmatjk0l8vn3jhfuwxaasjd65kn4ye9sce3egup7k993f8fg2q5tpxa6

hex

36a98caa7f4d9ca66429555560e361e009fbe8dc894635c2f29cb2e5ca05c06e

nevent

nevent1qqsrd2vv4fl5m89xvs5424tquds7qz0marwgj334ctefevh9egzuqmsprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsqm9a74et8lnkfcet578rw7cfxa2tf6jvjcvvcu5wqltzjc5n559q23fq8c

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-31T11:38:36Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

fa37329ee31b12419bffdc7d29e1ba6de6cae036d1c5b2d03bc434dda475d6ea...

Was the code free to copy and use? No.

Was the code publicly published? Yes.

Was it open source? Unfortunately the term HAS been overloaded but the answers above are more relevant.

Were people able to lay eyes and audit the code? Yes.

Were people incentivized to do so? Considering it's popularity and use by individuals, yes.

Could it be more scrutinised if it had a more permissive license? Probably. Passport was a fork of sorts, but it was forked well before the bug was introduced.

That much more? No.

Is it possible that it had a lot of eyes on it yet no one saw it? Yes.

Was it a stupid bug in hindsight? yes. 😢

Was the bug there visible for everyone to see? Yes.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "36a98caa7f4d9ca66429555560e361e009fbe8dc894635c2f29cb2e5ca05c06e",
  "pubkey": "0d97beae567fcec9c6574f1c6ef6126ea969d4992c3198e51c0fac52c5274a14",
  "created_at": 1785497916,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "fa37329ee31b12419bffdc7d29e1ba6de6cae036d1c5b2d03bc434dda475d6ea",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "root",
      "50054d07e2cdf32b1035777bd9cf73992a4ae22f91c14a762efdaa5bf61f4755"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "50054d07e2cdf32b1035777bd9cf73992a4ae22f91c14a762efdaa5bf61f4755",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Was the code free to copy and use? No.\n\nWas the code publicly published? Yes.\n\nWas it open source? Unfortunately the term HAS been overloaded but the answers above are more relevant.\n\nWere people able to lay eyes and audit the code? Yes.\n\nWere people incentivized to do so? Considering it's popularity and use by individuals, yes.\n\nCould it be more scrutinised if it had a more permissive license? Probably. Passport was a fork of sorts, but it was forked well before the bug was introduced.\n\nThat much more? No.\n\nIs it possible that it had a lot of eyes on it yet no one saw it? Yes.\n\nWas it a stupid bug in hindsight? yes. 😢\n\nWas the bug there visible for everyone to see? Yes.",
  "sig": "ed29ac19f2965c04e488ae93f6a63163abb7f67dc2d52adaeb872e6dca889878abf766df38a0e820eb282e2205dd9868804f23c80432bb5c32ae8f2ec0a6595b"
}