This was just a feeling I had. I dunno for sure.

Jay

npub10mtatsat7ph6rsq0w8u8npt8d86x4jfr2nqjnvld2439q6f8ugqq0x27hf

hex

38df35824555ea433491e25bf9aca646abd41134567a5e9e18c5496c47525015

nevent

nevent1qqsr3he4sfz4t6jrxjg7ykle4jnyd275zy69v7j7ncvv2jtvgaf9q9gprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs8a474cw4lqmapcq8hr7res4nknar2ey34fsffk0k42cjsdyn7yqq0vv2e3

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-03-09T22:26:26Z

↳ 回复 18905d0a... (npub1rzg96zjavgatsx5ch2vvtq4atatly5rvdwqgjp0utxw45zeznvyqfdkxve)

But I feel you’re referring to nuance in the truth, not nuance in conversation

This was just a feeling I had. I dunno for sure.

Like, if you don't know what's going on, or the truth of a situation isn't well known, it could actually be impossible to have a "nuanced" conversation that doesn't turn into a bunch of guesswork and made up conjectures.

And in the case where you do know something to be true, someone could say to have a nuanced discussion just as a persuasive technique to get you to believe some yarn they're trying to spin. Like, "you're ignoring important nuances," but the nuances are garbage.

And some things really are nuanced because there are a lot of conflicting things that are all true. I think that's the best place to address nuances.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "38df35824555ea433491e25bf9aca646abd41134567a5e9e18c5496c47525015",
  "pubkey": "7ed7d5c3abf06fa1c00f71f879856769f46ac92354c129b3ed5562506927e200",
  "created_at": 1773095186,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "a346fbe8ba116cc8d42f678c1a5f661e2785886ce3928729b06a8ebdb75a10a4",
      "",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "3b465412d21337faad3699370fa3f70c742f74e15dc16ba4da119ed2ec5210d9"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "a21c9ff147e1d2de5476aa1e5eefe82cd1544bac800bbe49619444f64ac48226",
      "",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "18905d0a5d623ab81a98ba98c582bd5f57f2506c6b808905fc599d5a0b229b08"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "7ed7d5c3abf06fa1c00f71f879856769f46ac92354c129b3ed5562506927e200"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "This was just a feeling I had. I dunno for sure.\n\nLike, if you don't know what's going on, or the truth of a situation isn't well known, it could actually be impossible to have a \"nuanced\" conversation that doesn't turn into a bunch of guesswork and made up conjectures.\n\nAnd in the case where you do know something to be true, someone could say to have a nuanced discussion just as a persuasive technique to get you to believe some yarn they're trying to spin. Like, \"you're ignoring important nuances,\" but the nuances are garbage. \n\nAnd some things really are nuanced because there are a lot of conflicting things that are all true. I think that's the best place to address nuances.",
  "sig": "8d9a534aa3373bde3e38830f3333fcad3e7606cbf44f79a0a095dfdf1e7b79d90de9d818a0a4f1953ad99ea0a7fe4bbd2af1fc1600f2787b1875d89a1d986a86"
}