We call that rhetorical dialectic memetic chicanery and you’...

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "42e8b97b84fb901ba942e26351d227608e00603b0f89df0e6c3d630e5b351a66",
  "pubkey": "1afe0c74e3d7784eba93a5e3fa554a6eeb01928d12739ae8ba4832786808e36d",
  "created_at": 1767116349,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "025f6106c25fc65be77dbf5e4201905c969ed6cb6b94ef1d3bb76f66989a3f74",
      "",
      "root",
      "1afe0c74e3d7784eba93a5e3fa554a6eeb01928d12739ae8ba4832786808e36d"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "287a11f6e4829e7961b3683f4e6c33eedd55518cef65226e975b1fec16890a38",
      "wss://nostr.mom",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "9a21569255d0a3a9e75f1de2e4c883c9be2e5615887f22b2ecf6b1813bcd587d",
      "",
      "mention"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "We call that rhetorical dialectic memetic chicanery and you’re right that I’m doing that. Where you’re wrong is that there’s no consistency. There is consistency. The question becomes is intentional ambiguity a tool to reveal truth or a hedge that avoids accountability? I think it’s a truth mechanism personally. I find a lot of truth in probing this way. ",
  "sig": "7dd8f18dec1e100f17829e65e1d3c2f22b4b74939125b63d919fe3925f9acd214ccc57a857d68b5b48d7c16e392c2129f7556307ff4152ae23b654e3fbabb683"
}