V similar concept!

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "522b27dab4036c57bb70492d63fe99ac7df68353c9bf4474529ec2e7fdf1caf4",
  "pubkey": "c4f5e7a75a8ce3683d529cff06368439c529e5243c6b125ba68789198856cac7",
  "created_at": 1774023817,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "efcc33fb90e482914e5a8a40d9c00fc24ac0b217ce92d124d922934ac7f1449c",
      "wss://relay.day.ag/",
      "root",
      "c4f5e7a75a8ce3683d529cff06368439c529e5243c6b125ba68789198856cac7"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "5852de26ca91e18699100398c4a6c81fcf6567c5abe628d1ecec5f98a7cc8795",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "reply",
      "da19f1cd34beca44be74da4b306d9d1dd86b6343cef94ce22c49c6f59816e5bd"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "d1bd33333733dcc411f0ee893b38b8522fc0de227fff459d99044ced9e65581b"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "da19f1cd34beca44be74da4b306d9d1dd86b6343cef94ce22c49c6f59816e5bd"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "V similar concept!\n\nThe main difference I see is that yours has the `type` tag in the spec itself, whereas the existing Attestation NIP leaves the Assertion/Subject event to provide that context.\n\nThe thinking there was that authorities (really just Attestors with verification clout in a given domain) would attest to so called 'first-person' assertions from the issuer/individual themselves. An attempt to invert the power structure, putting the person back at the center rather than the credential giver.\n\nLet's hop on a call to dicsuss!",
  "sig": "bcec7e785c5bb9ee6381d0044b29ffee22aa805aeb96a70d2f2fae2bd6ff666c70448df469de2cc33ea7101d10c03de26bce6ee1354d707ed0f9b5ea99ea285f"
}