"New use cases should always get consent from the network"

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "5b35f4f75ce69298fd180adf70674d482bf6dc9b111c4265ec726f851c5098d3",
  "pubkey": "12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6",
  "created_at": 1772610958,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: \"New use cases should always get consent from the ..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "a2c4ba892e2d4943f8fa99fbb523c23ffbfff1360730b8bbfa0560ca4ba83bb6",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "root",
      "26e9ab7f2c8d2ac37903af90be2a1aef6f2acbd699f4f259caac7ad33d2000c1"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "26e9ab7f2c8d2ac37903af90be2a1aef6f2acbd699f4f259caac7ad33d2000c1",
      "wss://relay.nos.social/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "https://xcancel.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2024952265719611458"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "\"New use cases should always get consent from the network\"\n\nI'm with him, as long as he agrees that a few dozen nodes are sufficient to grant that consent 😂\n\nLarge OP_RETURNs were formally approved by the relay network in 2024, by a few dozen nodes deciding to relay them. Therefore, the debate ended then\n\nhttps://xcancel.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2024952265719611458",
  "sig": "5685a1171abc246aeb165e1d9fa8895677f08afa0e724895ae8c803448d0b2ebb3ada6a4b97b0196d70353cdfde9bd196ab89a4374a3fb46e40b8b296fa62181"
}