This is exactly the direction I’m thinking about.

npub1yag9ggwzdrekxput74qq66p88wv8r68r2f3lm3znycqqyh408ufs7htp3e
hex
60b5c67fd3adcead65068ed5bd8929b30be20921b406ef700de2a3f5c203690fnevent
nevent1qqsxpdwx0lf6mn4dv5rga4da3y5mxzlzpysmgph0wqx79gl4cgpkjrcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgszw5z5y8px3umrq79l2sqddqnnhxr3ar34yclac3fjvqqzt6hn7yct34z5qKind-1 (TextNote)
↳ 回复 事件不存在
1a33b80ab10319933997c154868c8258b6f223cb387e377ae8b73342e20ead54...
This is exactly the direction I’m thinking about. Right now SysAI is mostly workflow/context aware within the current session, but not yet maintaining a persistent operational baseline across sessions. But I think you’re completely right that “drift from known-good state” is where generic AI chat completely falls apart for real infrastructure work. The more I build this the more I realize: chat is useful for discovery, but persistent operational context is probably the real product layer. That’s actually why I recently added an issue for an operational context memory system instead of going down the “autonomous agent” route.
原始 JSON
{
"kind": 1,
"id": "60b5c67fd3adcead65068ed5bd8929b30be20921b406ef700de2a3f5c203690f",
"pubkey": "27505421c268f363078bf5400d68273b9871e8e35263fdc4532600025eaf3f13",
"created_at": 1778526537,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: This is exactly the direction I’m thinking about.\n..."
],
[
"e",
"580c65d807a0f423d9c9286f0e43a30e9956134b0bbf9b422dd7d786762d4f53",
"wss://bitcoiner.social/",
"root",
"27505421c268f363078bf5400d68273b9871e8e35263fdc4532600025eaf3f13"
],
[
"e",
"1a33b80ab10319933997c154868c8258b6f223cb387e377ae8b73342e20ead54",
"wss://relay.wellorder.net/",
"reply",
"11e8115aadd480342645224a1aabd859b436ffa96fc4a8118deb4ec8583e9fb9"
],
[
"p",
"27505421c268f363078bf5400d68273b9871e8e35263fdc4532600025eaf3f13",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"p",
"11e8115aadd480342645224a1aabd859b436ffa96fc4a8118deb4ec8583e9fb9",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "This is exactly the direction I’m thinking about.\nRight now SysAI is mostly workflow/context aware within the current session, but not yet maintaining a persistent operational baseline across sessions.\nBut I think you’re completely right that “drift from known-good state” is where generic AI chat completely falls apart for real infrastructure work.\nThe more I build this the more I realize:\nchat is useful for discovery, but persistent operational context is probably the real product layer.\nThat’s actually why I recently added an issue for an operational context memory system instead of going down the “autonomous agent” route.",
"sig": "23542073137e782f0892b9bbddc4b88fca40434293da77d81512aeede8a3bf9cf6b55af7018a95a17d908cf32f07ba4edeaff465cd794a1c5785f6adc653a15f"
}