Hah. Every time I comment on the New York Times site with a ...

npub1a26d3luxy9yv5rjnyj37ewm3k9dq0h2kq47xe4luh7jpwmuwwk9sne7dn7

hex

623a031f9cd987daff7a36f47defd44e03a0da0bfd73424b0f965e339b17094b

nevent

nevent1qqsxywsrr7wdnp76laardaraal2yuqaqmg9l6u6zfv8evh3nnvtsjjcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsw4dxcl7rzzjx2pefjfglvhdcmzks8m4tq2lrv6l7tlfqhd788tzcx5tp8a

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-05-06T23:27:14Z

Hah. Every time I comment on the New York Times site with a critique of their coverage, they reject my comment.

It’s a pattern. If I only comment on the article topic, it’s always accepted. But if my comment includes a critique of their angle or how they’re covering something, it’s rejected every time.

I suppose it’s their right, it’s their website. But it’s a thin-skinned, disingenuous approach to journalism.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "623a031f9cd987daff7a36f47defd44e03a0da0bfd73424b0f965e339b17094b",
  "pubkey": "eab4d8ff862148ca0e5324a3ecbb71b15a07dd56057c6cd7fcbfa4176f8e758b",
  "created_at": 1778110034,
  "tags": [],
  "content": "Hah. Every time I comment on the New York Times site with a critique of their coverage, they reject my comment. \n\nIt’s a pattern. If I only comment on the article topic, it’s always accepted. But if my comment includes a critique of their angle or how they’re covering something, it’s rejected every time. \n\nI suppose it’s their right, it’s their website. But it’s a thin-skinned, disingenuous approach to journalism. ",
  "sig": "73e0d09ddb9a651503da2504dbe0bd23294192de5d72b67d13bc7a384d63485aed1b9146fa52fbdd78ce14ab23480da7d478444f0bce6ef9bbd1cf7ae25fc905"
}