You're right, of course.

vinney...axkl

npub19ma2w9dmk3kat0nt0k5dwuqzvmg3va9ezwup0zkakhpwv0vcwvcsg8axkl

hex

6a92d63382175033616355a847fa2d12738aa8a08effbe9c61c7925a40aa4647

nevent

nevent1qqsx4ykkxwppw5pnv934t2z8lgk3yuu24zsgala7n3su0yj6gz4yv3cprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsza748zkamgmw4he4hm2xhwqpxd5gkwju38wqh3twmtshx8kv8xvg6fxlju

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-06-09T20:23:57Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

b0fe028c2bec2fc4548cff5a775b73eb185f009aa863799a90f5a7700fdd79c7...

You're right, of course.
Everywhere else, recipients of value are the majority funders of the value delivered to them; when your electrician fixes your wiring, you pay him for it. Some portion of his current place in the industry and education level was socialized out a bit, but it's a rounding error compared to the direct payments.

But because software can be built once and used by many people, nobody feels that they need to be The One to pay for it. And they're not wrong in that... If it can be copied, it can't be owned; and if it can't be owned, its value drops considerably to the marginal enjoyment or utility it brings you while using it.

...So maybe what we're uncovering is that for all the hype and glitter, we actually don't really find the current crop of internet/software THAT valuable nor truly enjoyable. It's a bit of a fun goof here and there.

I do believe that'll change as the synergistic effects of open protocol pieces working together starts to yield truly society-altering experiences.
That's what I'm interested in.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "6a92d63382175033616355a847fa2d12738aa8a08effbe9c61c7925a40aa4647",
  "pubkey": "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
  "created_at": 1781036637,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "21630cba4e7946e9b2ec7f85665b94f13c71803e42acb3ba9edda103874f4131",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "root",
      "7cc328a08ddb2afdf9f9be77beff4c83489ff979721827d628a542f32a247c0e"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "b0fe028c2bec2fc4548cff5a775b73eb185f009aa863799a90f5a7700fdd79c7",
      "wss://theforest.nostr1.com/",
      "reply",
      "fea186c2a4678dbc437704eed2160846e8a781e5fb17056e9bb333840d5bdef2"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "7cc328a08ddb2afdf9f9be77beff4c83489ff979721827d628a542f32a247c0e"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "dd664d5e4016433a8cd69f005ae1480804351789b59de5af06276de65633d319"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "fea186c2a4678dbc437704eed2160846e8a781e5fb17056e9bb333840d5bdef2"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "You're right, of course.  \nEverywhere else, recipients of value are the majority funders of the value delivered to them; when your electrician fixes your wiring, you pay him for it. Some portion of his current place in the industry and education level was socialized out a bit, but it's a rounding error compared to the direct payments.  \n\nBut because software can be built once and used by many people, nobody feels that they need to be The One to pay for it. And they're not wrong in that... If it can be copied, it can't be owned; and if it can't be owned, its value drops considerably to the marginal enjoyment or utility it brings you _while using it_.  \n\n...So maybe what we're uncovering is that for all the hype and glitter, we actually don't **really** find the current crop of internet/software THAT valuable nor truly enjoyable. It's a bit of a fun goof here and there. \n\nI do believe that'll change as the synergistic effects of open protocol pieces working together starts to yield truly society-altering experiences.  \nThat's what I'm interested in.",
  "sig": "ad97e57a5155e90cfd68bce198bffdecbaf382d0ff0e3b6c6b75d38501abaddc97d9372b6f2df936164d89c7217c178232600c1f796c1e01604baa9b802288e3"
}