I think you mean Monero's tail emission.

npub1m5s9w4t03znyetxswhgq0ud7fq8ef8y3l4kscn2e8wkvmv42hh3qujgjl3
hex
6b8bc5da5ed78c43a96b79a65acb83520b96270e0c97bc5ebb157528ed2990a4nevent
nevent1qqsxhz79mf0d0rzr494hnfj6ewp4yzukyu8qe9aut6a32afga55epfqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsd6gzh24hc3fjv4ng8t5q87xlysru5njgl6mgvf4vnhtxdk24tmcsg8uyshKind-1 (TextNote)
↳ 回复 事件不存在
00000dba07adf0a2c08d1f34b3f067503e8c510320253db4fc2afa9af4d74b61...
I think you mean Monero's tail emission.
Yes, they are fundamentally different dynamics. This is a good point not a lot of people appreciate. I personally prefer gold's emission mechanics, and have actually (roughly) figured out a way to emulate it in cryptocurrency, but which is ideal is still an open question. A flat rate per block seems like it could maintain security adequate for the value secured perfectly, but it does nothing to smooth purchasing power (aka price) shocks. I don't know that that is necessary to do though, I think it is but empirically nobody knows yet.
What I am certain of though is that a fixed supply necessarily leads to a collapse in the security model down the road.
原始 JSON
{
"kind": 1,
"id": "6b8bc5da5ed78c43a96b79a65acb83520b96270e0c97bc5ebb157528ed2990a4",
"pubkey": "dd2057556f88a64cacd075d007f1be480f949c91fd6d0c4d593baccdb2aabde2",
"created_at": 1788383568,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: I think you mean Monero's tail emission.\n\nYes, the..."
],
[
"e",
"0000c700911edc55ec9c8d1f5a342d58d86f45f3bcfc12ec31ca3edc763ba66b",
"wss://nostr.wine/",
"root",
"f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb"
],
[
"e",
"00000dba07adf0a2c08d1f34b3f067503e8c510320253db4fc2afa9af4d74b61",
"wss://relay.primal.net/",
"reply",
"1ec7da9eca27ed9150ccd54c703926f877c783a728caed07b8287f3bd936a875"
],
[
"p",
"f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb",
"wss://profiles.nostr1.com/"
],
[
"p",
"1ec7da9eca27ed9150ccd54c703926f877c783a728caed07b8287f3bd936a875",
"wss://nostrelites.org/"
]
],
"content": "I think you mean Monero's tail emission.\n\nYes, they are fundamentally different dynamics. This is a good point not a lot of people appreciate. I personally prefer gold's emission mechanics, and have actually (roughly) figured out a way to emulate it in cryptocurrency, but which is ideal is still an open question. A flat rate per block seems like it could maintain security adequate for the value secured perfectly, but it does nothing to smooth purchasing power (aka price) shocks. I don't know that that is necessary to do though, I think it is but empirically nobody knows yet.\n\nWhat I am certain of though is that a fixed supply necessarily leads to a collapse in the security model down the road.",
"sig": "96d1ad3f8411edd580b42c1b6dda33f84b631e0d9726d61b36a15900bb88cf3fef294e9606b393c8534e17c5c5d56050c9c7662f39c1c0b2f7e1c6f1611ee6bd"
}