It doesn't "fork the network" in that sense. Forks of this k...

c4368c512e70e365...

npub1csmgc5fwwr3k2k86zeuk0ntnljp632g8agut8mtgxk8uhhatpknq3qcakv

hex

78c761e914a51b76edc06aba398765a6817096a6dac0d1dd0091a599abbf2f5c

nevent

nevent1qqs833mpay222xmkahqx4w3esaj6dqtsj6nd4sx3m5qfrfve4wlj7hqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsvgd5v2yh8pcm9trapv7t8e4eleqag4yr75w9na45rtr7tm74smfszlrvcz

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-03-05T01:40:30Z

↳ 回复 4d023ce9... (npub1f5pre6wl6ad87vr4hr5wppqq30sh58m4p33mthnjreh03qadcajs7gwt3z)

It forks the network, this weakens Bitcoin.

It doesn't "fork the network" in that sense. Forks of this kind are the normal and healthy way for us to tighten protocol constraints. Otherwise we would have to say "well, we can never fix the inscriptions hack or tighten up unnecessarily loose parameters that are getting abused". This is the process of rolling out changes that are just responsible maintenance. 110 will get enough signa from nodes, the miners will have no other rational choice than to come along. This is healthy. It's just the node runners way of say "no, we don't want to host your shitcoining spam. Nice try capturing woke devs and shoving through your shitcoinery, Citrea."

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "78c761e914a51b76edc06aba398765a6817096a6dac0d1dd0091a599abbf2f5c",
  "pubkey": "c4368c512e70e36558fa167967cd73fc83a8a907ea38b3ed68358fcbdfab0da6",
  "created_at": 1772674830,
  "tags": [
    [
      "p",
      "f1466500b9f96a607b7d77df275029c5cb1db968140f60bf1a6596b7e4a1fe82",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "4d023ce9dfd75a7f3075b8e8e084008be17a1f750c63b5de721e6ef883adc765",
      "wss://nostr.noones.com"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "f1466500b9f96a607b7d77df275029c5cb1db968140f60bf1a6596b7e4a1fe82",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "0b1a867e370742d63c9ccc8b9a8ba7e819d556940565e7073ff4f75d467ddc77",
      "wss://nostr.noones.com",
      "reply",
      "4d023ce9dfd75a7f3075b8e8e084008be17a1f750c63b5de721e6ef883adc765"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "48ca0203733e268c3bc974fa2805f50e87065f5973d4009345cdbe244da39f29",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "f1466500b9f96a607b7d77df275029c5cb1db968140f60bf1a6596b7e4a1fe82"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "It doesn't \"fork the network\" in that sense. Forks of this kind are the normal and healthy way for us to tighten protocol constraints. Otherwise we would have to say \"well, we can never fix the inscriptions hack or tighten up unnecessarily loose parameters that are getting abused\". This is the process of rolling out changes that are just responsible maintenance. 110 will get enough signa from nodes, the miners will have no other rational choice than to come along. This is healthy. It's just the node runners way of say \"no, we don't want to host your shitcoining spam. Nice try capturing woke devs and shoving through your shitcoinery, Citrea.\" \n\n",
  "sig": "9ce871f7dfdbc6785138e9f39d5c6189e0ec3e4d2cb5ee415637d91585b22c9a2a3d1f5dacb14a42c31dd8273d0db6eaa5c489313c29ab5af5694ccfdc7add28"
}