Yes, not directly, but indirectly. Giving people the idea t...

JackTheMimic

npub1m50e65pv09ga73lglrkjgh5tlgj006pv9rce8xdg7rn5kps38gssh2glzq

hex

87b9fd7424e3b9cb26d714fcadcbafd6ddf518209c144cc4795b33d7b1eb493c

nevent

nevent1qqsg0w0awsjw8wwtymt3fl9dewhadh04rqsfc9zvc3u4kv7hk845j0qprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsd68ua2qk8j5wlgl503mfyt69l5f8haqkz3uvnnx50pe6tqcgn5ggsq4h8w

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-14T12:08:37Z

↳ Reply to Tauri | Bitcoin BLAKE2b (XBT) (npub1x9q89st049pnuym57ch9kqkgzcu5dmff32wduwc4g9gnc2w3nlls8hcsg7)

> the potential for it to go very badly. More badly that already is? Have you seen the chain under the hood?

Yes, not directly, but indirectly. Giving people the idea that a contentious soft pork pushed through without a URSF it's not only doable, but more likely. To be fair, to BIP110 though, the SegWit soft fork really opened this door and BIP110 methodology is just widening it.

Remember, there's literally nothing anyone can do about someone spinning up fake pubkeys. That is a serious validation vulnerability and I don't think there's any (palatable) way to do anything about that.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "87b9fd7424e3b9cb26d714fcadcbafd6ddf518209c144cc4795b33d7b1eb493c",
  "pubkey": "dd1f9d502c7951df47e8f8ed245e8bfa24f7e82c28f19399a8f0e74b06113a21",
  "created_at": 1784030917,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: Yes,  not directly, but indirectly. Giving people ..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "344b282e0ad7f887ff91544fd5fc1ee6b1115d2f0ac2c004fb533975e7f83575",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "dd1f9d502c7951df47e8f8ed245e8bfa24f7e82c28f19399a8f0e74b06113a21"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "f1108e0a664fc6eacb58b1e1668e15c2701a4be02b1a90a5d0736d027cb6f309",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "",
      "dd1f9d502c7951df47e8f8ed245e8bfa24f7e82c28f19399a8f0e74b06113a21"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "60606f5589e826724b33c17acdf21c1eb352eb21f48155853f337de0662f1d16",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "reply",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "dd1f9d502c7951df47e8f8ed245e8bfa24f7e82c28f19399a8f0e74b06113a21",
      "wss://nos.lol/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
      "wss://nostr.wine/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Yes,  not directly, but indirectly. Giving people the idea that a contentious soft pork pushed through without a URSF it's not only doable, but more likely. To be fair, to BIP110 though, the SegWit soft fork really opened this door and BIP110 methodology is just widening it.\n\nRemember, there's literally nothing anyone can do about someone spinning up fake pubkeys. That is a serious validation vulnerability and I don't think there's any (palatable) way to do anything about that.",
  "sig": "3dc85ef9e66ce830ccf4d89772ec23b90027c662959049913fd53c7aff2c4b2977968ecc9f40f1b58292334812ce9cf323d1e2133dca3409d71282a195eb3b30"
}