Yes I also see and appreciate your point.

freemymind 🇨🇭

npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq

hex

900793689886fcc62ee1225c53f0dbd631eb084e80dbb4c9028d9f11a7632386

nevent

nevent1qqsfqpundzvgdlxx9msjyhzn7rdavv0tpp8gpka5eypgm8c35a3j8psprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgst0nulg2nedvy3appae6ge60h5crwg9cpfg5hd7z7meh4eajunu7qmr5ln9

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-09-05T10:51:55Z

↳ Reply to Event not found

a93260ebdbe79132e04997afcb55876e709e89ecf551bf0ba24d04babb6ec1e4...

Yes I also see and appreciate your point.

I see one dimension of a solution in mind shift. I think in order to act powerful one needs to first understand the current state. And one big problem I see ist the idea, that a person which has a lot of wealth is potent (intelligent, productive, smart).

I think most smart people come to wealth. Be it monetary, socially or mentally. But the reverse is not logically true for the fact of cheap inheritance.

I see a big part towards a fairer society, when more people understand that inheritet wealth is against merit based societies. And when someone wants to live in a society, where merit results in wealth, then inheritance is an enemy of this idea.

So my core argument. Inheriting unlimited wealth is the core of unfair inequality.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "900793689886fcc62ee1225c53f0dbd631eb084e80dbb4c9028d9f11a7632386",
  "pubkey": "b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78",
  "created_at": 1788605515,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "7d109d99f696ef978e89c3d47786d363a2ff88002e437cd3a0010e7c9b124812",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "b10cc2bfff033a8e4dfaa880bab4e23de714a7c20ea3215a0c64787e009e017e"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "000051fd26d2ae1fba438c55c1042f4e21e74f6fb0f2ba2ccf2f2d27c8ad9378",
      "wss://vault.iris.to/",
      "",
      "b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "a93260ebdbe79132e04997afcb55876e709e89ecf551bf0ba24d04babb6ec1e4",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "reply",
      "b10cc2bfff033a8e4dfaa880bab4e23de714a7c20ea3215a0c64787e009e017e"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "b10cc2bfff033a8e4dfaa880bab4e23de714a7c20ea3215a0c64787e009e017e",
      "wss://nsite.run/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78",
      "wss://atlas.nostr.land/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Yes I also see and appreciate your point.\n\nI see one dimension of a solution in mind shift. I think in order to act powerful one needs to first understand the current state.\nAnd one big problem I see ist the idea, that a person which has a lot of wealth is potent (intelligent, productive, smart).\n\nI think most smart people come to wealth. Be it monetary, socially or mentally. But the reverse is not logically true for the fact of cheap inheritance.\n\nI see a big part towards a fairer society, when more people understand that inheritet wealth is against merit based societies. And when someone wants to live in a society, where merit results in wealth, then inheritance is an enemy of this idea.\n\nSo my core argument. Inheriting unlimited wealth is the core of unfair inequality.",
  "sig": "b58514297aee2f23f6828d8f4f516694c58e567d6b83d9edeace3d166fc12ed9a0baed80c5f2d326737dddd0972dd4a1cfa0a830d7f4a5d0c56ee6f1a3dd3770"
}