We want on-chain fees to be as low as possible for as long a...

12ee03d11684a125...

npub1zthq85gksjsjthv8h6rec2qeqs2mu0emrm9xknkhgw7hfl7csrnq6wxm56

hex

97b8029c48b60b5edf51222b8b84af312dddc9ba64660cb9ccff51bf09037274

nevent

nevent1qqsf0wqzn3ytvz67magjy2utsjhnztwaexaxgesvh8x075dlpyphyaqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsp9msr6ytgfgf9mkrmapuu9qvsg9d78ua3ajntfmt580t5llvgpes4grhxm

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-02-21T23:17:44Z

↳ 回复 5143c373... (npub129puxu7lrd2g5a7hnmr57fe9t5ffk62m2gklkkl5xjvt5j6srhuswhhud3)

Calling yourself a bitcoiner while trying to choke demand for block space is a contradiction. Bitcoin lives on activity, on people fighting for space ...

We want on-chain fees to be as low as possible for as long as possible, as it helps with the security and scalability of Layer 2s

Similarly, we don't want people to put more monetary transactions on-chain "in order to price out the spam", for the same reason basically. If your monetary transaction is going to increase the size of the UTXO set, we'd prefer you to use a Layer 2, even if that means the blockspace is taken up by an OP_RETURN instead

The only time we want people to put transactions on-chain is if they consume more inputs than the number of outputs created

TL/DR: the long term goal is to keep blockspace cheap, to help with scaling, and for the inevitable spam to be in OP_RETURNs and in Witness data

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "97b8029c48b60b5edf51222b8b84af312dddc9ba64660cb9ccff51bf09037274",
  "pubkey": "12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6",
  "created_at": 1771715864,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: We want on-chain fees to be as low as possible for..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "7a08b25cee015ce1f01149fc529be41aa0f266d998dff9fc2ff09465b3f715e3",
      "wss://eden.nostr.land/",
      "root",
      "5143c373df1b548a77d79ec74f27255d129b695b522dfb5bf43498ba4b501df9"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "5143c373df1b548a77d79ec74f27255d129b695b522dfb5bf43498ba4b501df9",
      "wss://relay.snort.social/"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "We want on-chain fees to be as low as possible for as long as possible, as it helps with the security and scalability of Layer 2s\n\nSimilarly, we don't want people to put more monetary transactions on-chain \"in order to price out the spam\", for the same reason basically. If your monetary transaction is going to increase the size of the UTXO set, we'd prefer you to use a Layer 2, even if that means the blockspace is taken up by an OP_RETURN instead\n\nThe only time we want people to put transactions on-chain is if they consume more inputs than the number of outputs created\n\nTL/DR: the long term goal is to keep blockspace cheap, to help with scaling, and for the inevitable spam to be in OP_RETURNs and in Witness data",
  "sig": "0840d35379413eef66de026128f7178a6f54f5b4ad10b87d64ed2e0ca26b2f977fef746e6f80531167ec44d4d8228dc6b44a74cd39f581ba78682e2476b91a0d"
}