when you say "delete taproot", is that like deprecate? so ex...

gojiberra

npub1g49uyac6d83sss7sln8aumsstle7m3wxwwvc8mmpqsnr8e9f2cdq6ltqvs

hex

a06db717632bf1aecb8f3850d1a86875a9c90eea54336af781ba6789b26b2aee

nevent

nevent1qqs2qmdhza3jhudwew8ns5x34p58t2wfpm49gvm277qm5eufkf4j4msprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsy2j7zwudxnccgg0g0en77dcg9luldchr88xvraassgf3nuj54vxsclucwm

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-14T12:53:11Z

↳ 回复 mleku (npub1fjqqy4a93z5zsjwsfxqhc2764kvykfdyttvldkkkdera8dr78vhsmmleku)

i also work from first principles. but i am technical and can build the things trivially. so, i'll build my fork

when you say "delete taproot", is that like deprecate? so existing taproot UTXOs could still convert to normal UTXOs but no new Taproot UTXOs could be created?

and the Schnorr capability that exists within taproot would need to be built into the protocol level so taproot could be deleted?

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "a06db717632bf1aecb8f3850d1a86875a9c90eea54336af781ba6789b26b2aee",
  "pubkey": "454bc2771a69e30843d0fccfde6e105ff3edc5c6739983ef61042633e4a9561a",
  "created_at": 1784033591,
  "tags": [
    [
      "p",
      "4c800257a588a82849d049817c2bdaad984b25a45ad9f6dad66e47d3b47e3b2f",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "mleku"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "749ebea9c2c103fc1cda8ad0d68f3391085d81533f5e642b833bf90667a4568b",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "matteopellegrini"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "9e8b731c679ad872203c05dcd8dade7e55b87b65d669b5a5567c31095eb21439",
      "",
      "Jah"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "04c915daefee38317fa734444acee390a8269fe5810b2241e5e6dd343dfbecc9",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "ODELL"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
      "wss://eden.nostr.land/",
      "Tauri"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "558be06aca7df4f3e55b86a782745e905a12c55ba42c6a29ebb9be4c0b3ada2e",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "210fafba7a385ae393e3bec0d6982b4c82bb6963139b1aae891d2bf30d1e8f16",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "reply",
      "4c800257a588a82849d049817c2bdaad984b25a45ad9f6dad66e47d3b47e3b2f"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "when you say \"delete taproot\", is that like deprecate? so existing taproot UTXOs could still convert to normal UTXOs but no new Taproot UTXOs could be created?\n\nand the Schnorr  capability that exists within taproot would need to be built into the protocol level so taproot could be deleted?",
  "sig": "82d4b01cc13449becdb2b17fa21c3e49d5fbf2f586726229c24eaca3bbfbc4c137ad5a1323dbee9b1018358c79e8182714f77832a3f5b995bb8133ad1ab706af"
}