Is there a threat to Bitcoin?

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 30023,
  "id": "b2ef67818e975f258b6191c211cb30c912e5b50e8fe11a9aab68f0569f295f25",
  "pubkey": "fddb827e586a37a1f54e47b3bd710bcf8f29268069146d6e914539e0eebd31a0",
  "created_at": 1775599070,
  "tags": [
    [
      "title",
      "Is there a threat to Bitcoin?"
    ],
    [
      "summary",
      "Quantum computing isn’t an immediate threat to Bitcoin — but it’s not something to ignore. The real challenge is preparing without rushing changes that could create bigger risks than the problem itself."
    ],
    [
      "image",
      "https://blossom.primal.net/30ac6c9ec51293035aa5006f31f15aa0a8b455e4c56d2fecd52b5f2638a58156.jpg"
    ],
    [
      "d",
      "is-there-a-threat-to-bitcoin"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "nostr"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "Bitcoin"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "devs"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "quantum computing"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "usa"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "news"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://premium.primal.net/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.nostr.band/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://bevo.nostr1.com/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://dave.st.germa.in/nostr"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nos.lol/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nosflare.royalgarter.workers.dev/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nostr.wine/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://purplepag.es/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.cxplay.org/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Primal Studio"
    ],
    [
      "published_at",
      "1775599070"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "There’s an ongoing debate among developers and researchers about when Bitcoin should begin preparing for the potential impact of quantum computing.\n\nFigures like Samson Mow argue that acting too early could introduce unnecessary complexity and risk, potentially creating more problems than it solves. On the other side, Brian Armstrong has stated that he plans to begin working on the issue personally, emphasizing that it’s something the industry should address “sooner rather than later.”\n\nMy view sits in the middle.\n\nChanges to Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations should never be rushed. This is a system securing hundreds of billions in value, and even small mistakes at the protocol level can have massive, irreversible consequences. As Bitcoin developer Jonas Schnelli put it: *“The cure, rushed, could be worse than the disease.”*\n\nAt the same time, ignoring the problem entirely would be just as irresponsible.\n\nMost researchers agree that practical quantum threats to Bitcoin are still years away. That means there’s time — but not unlimited time. The right approach isn’t panic or delay, it’s preparation without activation.\n\nThat looks like:\n\n* Researching quantum-resistant cryptography\n\n* Testing proposals thoroughly\n\n* Building consensus gradually\n\n* Avoiding premature implementation\n\nBitcoin’s strength has always been its caution. It doesn’t move fast — it moves correctly.\n\nSo the goal isn’t to “fix” a problem that hasn’t arrived yet, but to make sure that when it does, Bitcoin is ready — without compromising the very security it’s trying to protect.\n",
  "sig": "ff318e8f0d1a8cec31482acf7b21846fbb0d527ad0f8217b36d92cb49bae0e58bd15fcc8d29b12b833e8f38ea76f2f935747623e890901199fa40a518afa9b43"
}