ah, i fixed those links. thanks

ynniv

npub12akj8hpakgzk6gygf9rzlm343nulpue3pgkx8jmvyeayh86cfrus4x6fdh

hex

ba0bb8ed5d6bc7ec11fb884b158a68766a07ff45b1cd6ad7924b51d8ff2f9fc2

nevent

nevent1qqst5zaca4wkh3lvz8acsjc43f58v6s8lazmrnt267fyk5wcluhelssprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs9wmfrms7myptdyzyyj330ac6ce70s7vcs5trredkzv7jtnavy37glt57sg

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-05-08T05:14:12Z

↳ 回复 Goose_in_Gensokyo (npub1zwfqq3xmqwsecmd7lm6w34fv04h6w4nrcee3rtehxhdskgq4gkks88n6zj)

I appreciated your work and wanna to test it... link to github (in your site)appears to be 404 >.< (also, there is no link to whitepaper from main pag...

ah, i fixed those links. thanks

the basic construction is that the operator appends updates to the ledger, but a quorum that they chose controls the onchain reserves utxo. if the operator goes bad, the quorum gives the reserves to a random quorum member, and the ledger is now their responsibility

if quorum members collude and do not reassign reserves in a timely manner, then the honest members of their own quorums will reassign their ledgers. the question is, how far does this scale. in my analyses and simulations, it is farther than expected

there has been more interest today than for many months – i will write more soon

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "ba0bb8ed5d6bc7ec11fb884b158a68766a07ff45b1cd6ad7924b51d8ff2f9fc2",
  "pubkey": "576d23dc3db2056d208849462fee358cf9f0f3310a2c63cb6c267a4b9f5848f9",
  "created_at": 1778217252,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "02889611ff7900e5b1e6ab47bf1f3ab3f9b8ce6c8ca9feda70215bb9b55f5fb5",
      "",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "4aa80ef1eba13ccda8505dd954131d4ae0fd3f95f44a97e8d5af4762d5aa82a5",
      "wss://relay.primal.net",
      "reply",
      "13920044db03a19c6dbefef4e8d52c7d6fa75663c67311af3735db0b201545ad"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "3f770d65d3a764a9c5cb503ae123e62ec7598ad035d836e2a810f3877a745b24"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "13920044db03a19c6dbefef4e8d52c7d6fa75663c67311af3735db0b201545ad"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "ah, i fixed those links. thanks\n\nthe basic construction is that the operator appends updates to the ledger, but a quorum that they chose controls the onchain reserves utxo. if the operator goes bad, the quorum gives the reserves to a random quorum member, and the ledger is now their responsibility\n\nif quorum members collude and do not reassign reserves in a timely manner, then the honest members of their own quorums will reassign their ledgers. the question is, how far does this scale. in my analyses and simulations, it is farther than expected\n\nthere has been more interest today than for many months – i will write more soon",
  "sig": "5e4cdc41b48fbc4954c3e1a7caf536913645cd8ae09da68677cf951a9fa695ce7796bedeb2b63c309d716c97315a423e5c37b7e301dc0146f038c8cb4c3ee6e4"
}