Nostr.land is planning to support OTS.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "c4bc4c004ff856eae55faeb200fb57e6dc3be2df814c89fcc2ac1620a9b7f902",
  "pubkey": "52b4a076bcbbbdc3a1aefa3735816cf74993b1b8db202b01c883c58be7fad8bd",
  "created_at": 1781185772,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "81ecd99b80ec128c2e22bdf566062f43995985ae5eb9a987d65f857184a6e121",
      "",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "da66db47722df5d3381f9561252496489ee12e5fc138b0bc48fdf0bb9237aab5",
      "",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "d1a61498f4b1dc26df0becd1a3e9e88f355fb614b771e8b5b277d0ff99a82a23"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "52b4a076bcbbbdc3a1aefa3735816cf74993b1b8db202b01c883c58be7fad8bd"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Nostur",
      "31990:9be0be0fc079548233231614e4e1efc9f28b0db398011efeecf05fe570e5dd33:1685868693432"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Nostr.land is planning to support OTS.\n\nI’m planning to use the standard OTS spec that is already well-implemented. “Inline” proofs is not something I plan to support as a client can easily request OTS proofs when necessary.\n\nAlso, I hate AI written “specs” so much as they have so much useless junk (like wtf is the s tag for?) and overcomplicate things.\n\n",
  "sig": "d846aa7e1e66f63ab6418b87eadbc9782569ec3750d923bee90306bb66f0ec5cdd4fa511a1799989782ae7d1501042fb0e570d71c8f03ace43e8e3eff325381d"
}