I don't see this as a black and white thing. People have bee...

M0053 (Balakay2b edition)

npub1qktjyk0vdqlfss7wztawdnka5phx2p3vlvq50x0z402jk2fjhtnqlx9qas

hex

f5371ef45b4a61539667f0739bdfdc2831ea3e3f26231c7c130b897592413b8c

nevent

nevent1qqs02dc773d55c2njenlquummlwzsv028cljvgcu0sfshzt4jfqnhrqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsqt9ezt8kxs05cg08p97hxemw6qmn9qck0kq28n832h4ft9yet4esuz232x

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-02T17:17:31Z

↳ 回复 corndalorian (npub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5)

I can give the benefit of the doubt to most people who promoted Coldcard to other users, such as podcasters and online influencers and other Coldcard ...

I don't see this as a black and white thing. People have been involved, paid by coinkite, promoted coinkite, sometimes even VCs for coinkite.

So I would think some of it's kind of a sliding scale. The deeper those things were being promoted, the more onus I believe those influencers would have had to run audits, maybe even pay for audits on the code.

This is such a glaring and hideously gaping hole that we were falling back to a tinker toy RNG. It really becomes close to inexcusable for anyone who was profiting from the sale of these devices.

I have heard some really good podcasters that coin sessions comes to mind owning their part and apologizing and I find that to be admirable.

Interestingly though, we are still waiting on more input from some of our more "humble" "thought leaders".

I'm not ragging on people, I'm not angry, but the truth is the truth, and people are gonna need to own this shit.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "f5371ef45b4a61539667f0739bdfdc2831ea3e3f26231c7c130b897592413b8c",
  "pubkey": "05972259ec683e9843ce12fae6cedda06e65062cfb014799e2abd52b2932bae6",
  "created_at": 1785691051,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: I don't see this as a black and white thing. Peopl..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "f39e393aa6ce9dff80b8697cf25918def9a12ebe37d5a117f2be3fcf275dd203",
      "wss://premium.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "f8e6c64342f1e052480630e27e1016dce35fc3a614e60434fef4aa2503328ca9"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "f8e6c64342f1e052480630e27e1016dce35fc3a614e60434fef4aa2503328ca9",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "I don't see this as a black and white thing. People have been involved, paid by coinkite, promoted coinkite, sometimes even VCs for coinkite.\n\nSo I would think some of it's kind of a sliding scale. The deeper those things were being promoted, the more onus I believe those influencers would have had to run audits, maybe even pay for audits on the code.\n\nThis is such a glaring and hideously gaping hole that we were falling back to a tinker toy RNG. It really becomes close to inexcusable for anyone who was profiting from the sale of these devices.\n\nI have heard some really good podcasters that coin sessions comes to mind owning their part and apologizing and I find that to be admirable.\n\nInterestingly though, we are still waiting on more input from some of our more \"humble\" \"thought leaders\".\n\nI'm not ragging on people, I'm not angry, but the truth is the truth, and people are gonna need to own this shit.",
  "sig": "c2d66b05bafc71baeca23e9c34616a232dfd74e9098217261e58573b45f1a59af855ad2cefc9eaaa6b37d72dc107f5a8be00c489ae25e2531c298aa0b306863f"
}