316e8bed3c98c877...

I don't know of any good alternative. The only Twitter web-viewer I know of that still works is: - https://carryfeed.com/ However, its UI is not good. I haven't looked into running my own Nitter instance or creating a shadow account because I don't need to read twitter posts that bad. My guess is Twitter shadow account (fake, single-use email + VPN) is the simplest alternative for now. Can also delete account and recreate new one with different email/VPN from time to time.

It was a joke. I don't know much about Justin Bieber, but many cases of child stars successfully deprogramming themselves around the age of 30. Some speculate MK Ultra programming starts to wear off around 30.

The video in which Elon Musk talks about "magic money computers" in multiple departments of the US government. These computers can just make money out of thin air. "They just send money out of nothing." He talks about the numbers being off by 5-10% in some cases, but would you be surprised if the numbers are off by hundreds/thousands of percentage points? Catherine Austin Fitts (Secretary of Housing and Urban Development) often talks about how she discovered missing trillions of dollars (~1990). The day before 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld (Secretary of Defense) said they could not account for 2.3 trillion dollars. That was in 2001. Take into account the actual (not official) size of the derivatives market (in the quadrillions), and you get very good reasons not to save in fiat, and not to save exclusively in the financial system (stocks, bonds, ETFs, etc.). Infinite keystroke wealth is not a thing. https://blossom.primal.net/03781f0b760c7da2565bed840b4380bc9da08557f674453a07459da7550b594b.mp4

You've posted a photo of the view of the Sistine Chapel from the dome of St. Peter's Basilica. Still, no way they could've built what you posted in 1480 with manual and animal power, but your faith in the mainstream narrative is strong. According to your source, Google, "In the 1500s, house construction relied entirely on manual labor, highly specialized hand tools, and mechanical leverage systems like pulleys and winches." I guess they were really good builders back then if the Chapel survived 500 years and is still standing strong.

Thinking you need synthetic fertilizers to grow the population is akin to thinking you need to inject every human and animal with heavy metals to protect them from viruses that don't exist, so you can grow the population. It is basically modern scientism - you need to intervene, to fix this imperfect system that was created by a coincidence. I guess the population had a synthetic fertilizer deficiency, so they just couldn't figure out a way to thrive for the first 1800 years. Natural fertilizers aren't scarce, especially if you don't declare war on cows, chickens, horses, etc. I didn't post any photos of the pyramids, I posted photos of palaces that were later adapted into State Capitol buildings. I'd imagine the people who built these and many other palaces weren't struggling for food and these buildings weren't built when the official narrative claims. I'd assume that supplying post-reset humans with synthetic fertilizers would increase the population, yes, but I'm not sure that humans in the 1100s, 1300s, 1500s, 1600s, etc. hadn't figured out how to keep themselves fed while building these and many other palaces. I don't know how many people we have now, but I'd assume way less than 8 billion. I'd also be willing to bet that the graph before 1800 is complete garbage.

No way to know what they had/didn't have unless you want to defer to mainstream his-story-ans. If you can't get reliable information on current events, why would you expect to get reliable information on events that allegedly happened hundreds/thousands of years ago. I guess before the 1900s they were building these with donkeys and without power tools. nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqvtw30knexxgwasss0qwafnz68hdx6u25xwpclsz4750ez46qpx2qqsd2f9gpll9x0meskp3hh0ysrt3fus7u4grfegp24txlw6uyqq0htsd99s7d Good alternative history playlist for those who might be interested: - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NFncJvS6AY&list=PLVsHlWhRW4zyNB1MIC-9DsVmQzNJxAjd3

Seems legit. It took them 1800 years to hit the first billion people, and now we're growing a billion every 10 years. Imagine if we didn't have vaccines, feminism, countless women murdering their children, and advanced contraception with birth control pills, condoms, IUDs, and surgical procedures. We'd be at at least 20 billion. All governments agree that we're at 8.3 billion people, so it must be true. I guess the first 1800 years, they were more focused on saving the "planet". https://blossom.primal.net/1e9728cee510ed3b30fb460f7c8064dce1a1774f9738f9dd40404260eaf7c5e1.png

Man, I like Jeff Booth, but sometimes the statements he makes are wild: - "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger, so they'll try to co-opt it." - "As long as Bitcoin stays decentralized and secure ... then XYZ" Jeff is not like the other mainstream Bitcoin salesmen, in my opinion, he gives off good guy energy. He's actually the guy who "orange-pilled" me and I've made lots of fiat on my Bitcoin trades. He'd probably say that if I think in fiat terms, I don't understand Bitcoin, but I think that in order to really understand Bitcoin, you also have to understand how the world works. If you don't understand how the world works, your attempts at Game Theory are worse than useless. The people who focus only on understanding how the protocol works are too zoomed in to see the bigger picture. The idealistic, protocol-centric scenario is unrealistic under a One World Government this tyrannical. So I listened to a recent Jeff Booth podcast to see if he's updated his view on certain things, but he hasn't. It's easy to tell because all of his podcasts are really just the same 1st principles presentation. Going back to this quote: - "As long as Bitcoin stays decentralized and secure ... then XYZ" This of course assumes that Bitcoin is decentralized and secure. I guess we'll have to ignore: - 6-7 mining pools being close to 90% of the hash, - Bitcoin Core being 80+% of the nodes, - most retail users interacting through mobile wallets or browser extensions controlled by Apple and Google, - increasingly more draconian on/off-ramp custody and surveillance, - paperization practically destroying the 21M meme, - crazy tax and regulatory frictions on payments, - crazy Lightning Network centralization and regulation, - significant portion of the reachable nodes being hosted on major cloud providers, - centralized ASIC production, - centralized out-of-the-box, noob-friendly hardware wallet production, - etc. Going back to this quote: - "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger, so they'll try to co-opt it." Let's assume that they can kill Bitcoin for a second. Why in the world would they want to kill Bitcoin? For 99% of cases, they'd rather you use Bitcoin than gold/silver, Monero or cash. Unless you're moving tens/hundreds of millions of non-KYC Bitcoin to sponsor groups the Controllers don't like, they'd much rather you used Bitcoin than gold or cash. As I've previously written, it is very likely Bitcoin was actually created by the government, so it makes very little sense for them to kill it in the current environment (with more adversarial alternatives available). https://blossom.primal.net/5476a16fbbdd25ee92aadcc6d2f29544b487ddb21e5c9f282c6014626c99a799.png Can we at least stop pretending that Bitcoin in its current state is anti-establishment technology that makes our Jewish central bankers want to shut it down? That's just cringe. For most Bitcoiners, the "have they co-opted Bitcoin test" is: "Is there a new block every ~10 minutes? (tick-tock, next-block?)" - If yes, Bitcoin = not co-opted - If no, Bitcoin = co-opted Of course, this is a gross oversimplification - it focuses only on the protocol, while ignoring the policy and perimeter layers. It's like saying: "If human breathing:" - then human = healthy - otherwise human = unhealthy On this part: - "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger" My best attempt at pointing out where Bitcoin is stronger compared to 5-10 years ago: - more people know about it (is good and bad), - more hashrate (although insanely centralized, so doesn't mean much), - higher fiat price (greater incentive to defend BTC), - more people running nodes (although ordinary user nodes are at the bottom of the food-chain), - more client decentralization (although Core still at 80%+). So, a more honest Bitcoin pitch: - Hey, we've got this thing that: - might go up in fiat terms, - is very easy and convenient to transport across borders, - might protect you against the Great Taking if self-custodied properly, - is very CIA/MO$$AD, MI6-aligned, so they've got no incentive to kill it. Think of it as a stock of a blue-chip company, but a stock you can self-custody. So, essentially similar to a paper stock certificate of a Blue-Chip company that is Controllers-aligned (e.g. NVDA, MSFT, GOOG, AAPL, AMZN, etc.). This is the honest pumper Bitcoin pitch. Not - "We are about to separate money and state (... after we get permission from the state), and the Jewish bankers are pissing their pants." nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqvtw30knexxgwasss0qwafnz68hdx6u25xwpclsz4750ez46qpx2qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet59uqzq4v7ru584vcm5ljrzyv03fvgnslmpxc4mxvxs5ugjnvxjfke2q7sdaxg93

It's tough. I knew most hardware wallets were backdoored and still used coldcard because - Bitcoin-only and thought that someone had already done the work and verified seeds are random. Someone probably did verify, but then they changed their RNG algos in 2021 (I had no clue). Massive red flag in hindsight. I am not affected, but it's a terrible way to get rugged for everyone who is. It's been 18 years and we still haven't figured out self-custody, but you still have influencers talking about separating money and state. Delusional. nostr:nevent1qqs9y57635e9kywmd9k4j9t3qgpduxdsu58cwt4prfgt4pn8ynmr70czyqckazld8jvvsamppq7qa6nx950w6d4c4gvur3lq9taglj9t5qzv5qcyqqqqqqg2aufkp

Just sitting here on this pear-shaped, wet rock, spinning at 1,000 mph and traveling through space at 66,600 mph. https://blossom.primal.net/5a3bdd754bc63027173be43fcdb822a7722a6cf020823fb65c3bd4891e53eca4.mp4 This would have been impossible if nothing didn't explode and turn into everything, enabling us to evolve from pond scum. https://blossom.primal.net/4c17ea50fe36efe5e2bf468cd2b12443f42a83b6440c7bb8cfd4f4d13df436c0.jpg Thank God these scientists figured everything out for me so I don't have to think for myself 🙏

Just got debanked for the first time. Randomly got a notification that 100K euro have been transferred from my account. Went to the local bank, and the lady told me they've decided to close my account. When I asked why, she told me "We don't have to give you any reason. We can just close your account.". Told her I want to transfer my 100K euro to a different bank, and she told me that the money is no longer in my account, so she has to ask whether they'll allow me to transfer it 😂 It is a good reminder that a deposit is a loan you make to a bank. You are an unsecured creditor of the bank, not the owner of any specific asset the bank holds. They can just fuck with you. Had to wait ~1 for the central office to give me permission to transfer my money to another bank, then had to pay 15 EUR for my bank statement since they already closed my online banking 😂 I use bank deposits because I must (payments, interface with the system), but this is a good reminder not to confuse them with survival capital in this rotten regime. Banks are just a state-dependent intermediary and the state is the enemy.

The DARPA "entrepreneurs" reading from the same script as always 😂 But guys, I thought Elon Musk and Sam Altman hated each other 😂 They've already sold their souls and they're trying to take as many people with them as possible. The Amish always knew not to play their Jewish, Satanic games. Their goal: a One World government that fully replaces God. Government replaces God when it becomes the highest practical authority over meaning, morality, safety, identity, money, speech, movement, family, life, death, forgiveness, punishment, and the future. The test is simple: - Can you say "God says no" and still live? The more the answer becomes "not really", the more the replacement has already happened. https://blossom.primal.net/513373ff5aadcdfbde8767be1b4c95ad2ebd896d34ec12a011cbca745b8e0ce8.mp4

The professor Jiang character is very interesting. Graduated Yale university and used to work for the UN (aka the One World Government organization that sponsors child trafficking and genocide by vaccines). He was suspected by the Chinese government of spying in 2002 and was deported 😂 Going viral organically doesn't really work in 2026. Platforms like Twitter, Youtube, TikTok, only promote content that pushes the official narrative (so plants and useful idiots). After watching a few of his videos, I think it is very likely he is an intelligence asset (most likely CIA). He could be a useful idiot but I find this less likely based on his takes. It was much easier for intelligence agencies to control people's access to information pre-Covid. Many more people used to watch mainstream media, but the CIA pushed the propaganda too far. Once different networks started repeating the same script word for word, people stopped watching and lost trust. The CIA knew they needed to keep control of the narrative, so they started pushing certain "independent media" personalities. Tucker Carlson (CIA) got "fired" by Fox news (even though he had the highest ratings 😂) just because people stopped watching TV and the CIA needs him to reach more people. In many cases, even when professor Jiang is likely correct about his conclusions, his argumentation is so flawed that he ends up pushing people away from the "conspiracy theory". Watching some of his recent videos remind me of the recent podcast with Joe Rogan and Theo Von. The whole podcast looked like a hostage video. Both completely compromised (especially Rogan) and terrified to not say something they shouldn't say. Professor Jiang is a bit more subtle than these guys, but I still find it unlikely he's a useful idiot based on his interviews. The "this is extremely dangerous to our democracy" moment is probably when the CIA knew they had to focus on pushing the "independent" media personalities. https://blossom.primal.net/6d5abd78445ae441cb84e7845a311a2abc8399d5786fd1b5c7682c315e9f2b56.mp4 Controlling the media is at the core of the protocols of the learned elders of Zion. The CIA hasn't given up on propaganda now that mainstream media is cooked (only watched by boomers, retards, and retarded boomers). https://blossom.primal.net/c811efbbfdf2ad9adaf8461275ae9f31571887068ab0c2327b04b845e45436f3.jpg

I try to be a freedom maxi. Whatever gives you the most freedom is what you should use. I've covered what made me fall out of love with Bitcoin in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ). TL;DR - no privacy by default, DEI developers who've been attacking its sovereign/MoE use, L2s seem like a failed project at least from the mass, non-custodial use viewpoint, etc. The community having to coordinate to defend Bitcoin from attackers all of the time (the Coordination tax I've written about) is why I think we'll be stuck in infinite "Bitcoin wars": - Core v30 — Inscriptions / spam vs "art" (ongoing) - Taint, "clean UTXOs" & compliant-Bitcoin vs grey-Bitcoin - Node liability & "publisher" / CSAM / sanctions content - Quantum-resistance, key-rotation & "lost coins" - Paperization & "wrapped Bitcoin" vs base-layer Bitcoin - Protocol ossification vs "surgery to survive" - Blockspace & "digital cash vs data chain" (the rematch) The Core v30 fiasco and how many people updated their node software by default, was a big wake up call for me. If I immerse myself in all of this garbage, I'll probably start aging in dog years.