↳ 回复 corndalorian (npub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5)
Perfectly said on the state of zaps and V4V on Nostr nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2px...
I'm only responding based on this clip but i think there is just little value in earning money on social media in a traditional way. People are so use...
I'm only responding based on this clip but i think there is just little value in earning money on social media in a traditional way. People are so used to paying no money on the big platforms that over here it's only (fractions of) a cent because it is just worth that much.
Let's project this on a real world example of how i see social media. If i go meet with some friends and they tell me what they have been up to and share a funny story or 2 i also do not go around giving everybody money for it at the end of the night. To me this is what all this mostly reflects or should reflect.
I'm happy to send a cent or more if i had a giggle and i do not really know you as a form of appreciation and acknowledgement, but I'm not gonna go around and zap several dollars for almost anything except appds that i use our podcasts i might listen to. I might zap 500 sats or maybe 1000 on a long form article here or there which is in my opinion a pretty good amount if i compare it to a newspaper which has almost exclusively long form content and costs only a few dollars.
And then there is still the simple fact that your reach here is super tiny. Tens of people might see your post. If you have many followers maybe hundreds. How many people walk by all kiosks and don't buy a specific newspaper or magazine being sold there? Probably millions.
To me it's a simple combination of scale and type of content and i think most people are more generous on here specifically because the zap standard is so low. I don't think anybody would ever get zapped if we had a minimum requirement of 1000 sats.
Kind-1 (TextNote)