The questions knots raised were / are 100% valid questions.

zaytun

npub1wnw8s4eq2uwkhdvyue72m0w5u3zfhywuuk4nrunxeg3wac958n9st845pr

hex

0000be05ef17ed37d6f194caa4a0bd5ab6a1e63c21ccb050d94dc10948f675f1

nevent

nevent1qqsqqq97qhh30mfh6mcefj4y5z744d4puc7zrn9s2rv5msgffrm8tugprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs8fhrc2us9w8ttkkzwvl9dhh2wg3ymj8wwt2e37fnv5ghwuz6rejc3pg84k

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-09T08:29:38Z

↳ Reply to Tauri | Bitcoin BLAKE2b (XBT) (npub1x9q89st049pnuym57ch9kqkgzcu5dmff32wduwc4g9gnc2w3nlls8hcsg7)

GM. I was wrong. bCore wasn’t right. Bitcoin is in the worst state it has ever been. Bitcoin Independence Day is now void of any meaning. May God be ...

The questions knots raised were / are 100% valid questions.

Seems the wider community just didn't care.

BIP110 was a wrong solution to a valid problem. This has been stated by many great minds in bitcoin.

The problem was it was also the only solution.

That puts real plebs in a difficult situation and creating the choice of "bad" or "worse".

I think core is "worse", but enough people didn't agree.

I think bip110 enforced the way it was, was horrible, but for me personally, I'd rather do that and win the rest of the community over than do nothing at all.

Samson Mow said on The bitcoin podcast, paraphrasing "core made the change, i didnt agree with it and gave them shit for it, but its done, they already did it, its over, so I moved on and stopped talking about it"

That doesnt sit well with me, to just say "ok, ill continue running your code"

And thats the feeling and attitude that pushed me to want something else.

I personally feel that "something else" was just running knots instead.

Clearly the BIP110 part of things was not the right call.

I think we as bitcoiners just need to be and do better.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "0000be05ef17ed37d6f194caa4a0bd5ab6a1e63c21ccb050d94dc10948f675f1",
  "pubkey": "74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb",
  "created_at": 1786264178,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "c3da0f5953ef6043c5d4b6cdfe69fb94b6cb1ae87571ade1c573ae856ba2b5fa",
      "wss://wot.utxo.one",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Wisp"
    ],
    [
      "nonce",
      "77050",
      "16"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "The questions knots raised were / are 100% valid questions.  \n\nSeems the wider community just didn't care. \n\nBIP110 was a wrong solution to a valid problem. This has been stated by many great minds in bitcoin. \n\nThe problem was it was also the *only* solution. \n\nThat puts real plebs in a difficult situation and creating the choice of \"bad\" or \"worse\".\n\nI think core is \"worse\", but enough people didn't agree. \n\nI think bip110 enforced the way it was, was horrible, but for me personally, I'd rather do that and win the rest of the community over than do nothing at all. \n\nSamson Mow said on The bitcoin podcast, paraphrasing \"core made the change, i didnt agree with it and gave them shit for it, but its done, they already did it, its over, so I moved on and stopped talking about it\"\n\nThat doesnt sit well with me, to just say \"ok, ill continue running your code\"\n\nAnd thats the feeling and attitude that pushed me to want something else. \n\nI personally feel that \"something else\" was just running knots instead. \n\nClearly the BIP110 part of things was not the right call. \n\nI think we as bitcoiners just need to be and do better.",
  "sig": "707b7832ae5913bd65cd9da52e77ce3140bf6129933ba96b18e733d66780304e79506f68a3ec860255d0a55350a73e7e67222ae37a789e0957952f57c42cc510"
}