"reasonable" expectation as defined by who? plenty of people...

vinney...axkl

npub19ma2w9dmk3kat0nt0k5dwuqzvmg3va9ezwup0zkakhpwv0vcwvcsg8axkl

hex

0000d6f2b5c2ce91df248eb1db6b2fa016fd86ed5a87406d4c9034c9c8762d57

nevent

nevent1qqsqqqxk726u9n53mujgavwmdvh6q9hasmk44p6qd4xfqdxfepmz64cprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsza748zkamgmw4he4hm2xhwqpxd5gkwju38wqh3twmtshx8kv8xvgmdyzp4

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-06-08T18:44:37Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

5c0893c1e5bc4ffd330f8d7be8f0c2b632c647f960f65db3865ff4d3d648ddc6...

"reasonable" expectation as defined by who? plenty of people think that certain kinds of speech (or even beliefs) are not only expectation of harm, but the utterances themselves are violence. must i agree that those are "reansonable" expectations just because they're common among a certain group?

those are all super grey zones that turn entirely on what you believe and who you "side with" and how popular those ideas are. my definition above (about exclusive control) doesn't suffer that grey zone interpretation problem as fatally.

it would be the SWAT team that is guilty of violence in the case of a swatting instance - not the caller or the doxer.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "0000d6f2b5c2ce91df248eb1db6b2fa016fd86ed5a87406d4c9034c9c8762d57",
  "pubkey": "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
  "created_at": 1780944277,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "1a40aa418672da880ddfdf7475761e91c975413a3e44fff9b9f672276f08f33a",
      "wss://nostr.land/",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "5c0893c1e5bc4ffd330f8d7be8f0c2b632c647f960f65db3865ff4d3d648ddc6",
      "wss://nostr.land",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "010df0c948fe9ab54d2cb7ea420ffa08d57958981b6ea68e83aaa7eb2dd3f05a"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Wisp"
    ],
    [
      "nonce",
      "56842",
      "16"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "\"reasonable\" expectation as defined by who? plenty of people think that certain kinds of speech (or even beliefs) are not only expectation of harm, but the utterances themselves are violence. must i agree that those are \"reansonable\" expectations just because they're common among a certain group?\n\nthose are all super grey zones that turn entirely on what you believe and who you \"side with\" and how popular those ideas are. my definition above (about exclusive control) doesn't suffer that grey zone interpretation problem as fatally.\n\nit would be the SWAT team that is guilty of violence in the case of a swatting instance - not the caller or the doxer.",
  "sig": "0a6046aedea8e40e971cad95e8df3059d7d17ef7dcbd0ea9a7f6d4dc8fc25b50b76640b13e4233088706d9723b0e6d58e1cf53019f5f52670a0262f1dbeec8d1"
}