On-chain, dust limits prevent super tiny amounts and rationa...

Leo Wandersleb

npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6

hex

0960094e00e7b5987677ea990f057313647cdca66e98c3e2ef165305cc5b38a4

nevent

nevent1qqsqjcqffcqw0dvcwem74xg0q4e3xerumjnxaxxruth3v5c9e3dn3fqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsydl97xpj74udw0qg5vkfyujyjxd3l706jd0t0w0turp93d0vvungcm9u9s

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-05-11T12:32:08Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

6253b106dbf4b3cad6d1db53059df35dab9ee68bca7ec82091f0f080d12493b2...

On-chain, dust limits prevent super tiny amounts and rational users would shy back from tiny-ish amounts but when I want to zap somebody $200 - support his project - why not have a standard to do that on-chain? Sure, when fees surge again, it will crowd out even the $200 band but then it'll be the $2000 zaps that will make sense. Those are few now but not unheard of neither. If nostr reaches its potential of billions of users, it would be only likely to see zaps of much higher value, too every now and then. And when you really want to zap somebody $2000, LN won't let you. You might have the funds in your LN wallet but the other won't have the inbound capacity.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "0960094e00e7b5987677ea990f057313647cdca66e98c3e2ef165305cc5b38a4",
  "pubkey": "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
  "created_at": 1778502728,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "97956e3f0b6b3204358db928bda334ac2365dbe8d637119803e9fb8d900f169a",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "root",
      "0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "6253b106dbf4b3cad6d1db53059df35dab9ee68bca7ec82091f0f080d12493b2",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "reply",
      "b481d853bdd549c8cad18dcc1fb1fc8dba6e96b60278fcec388bb15967f95a2d"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "fdd5e8f6ae0db817be0b71da20498c1806968d8a6459559c249f322fa73464a7"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "b481d853bdd549c8cad18dcc1fb1fc8dba6e96b60278fcec388bb15967f95a2d"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "On-chain, dust limits prevent super tiny amounts and rational users would shy back from tiny-ish amounts but when I want to zap somebody $200 - support his project - why not have a standard to do that on-chain? Sure, when fees surge again, it will crowd out even the $200 band but then it'll be the $2000 zaps that will make sense. Those are few now but not unheard of neither. If nostr reaches its potential of billions of users, it would be only likely to see zaps of much higher value, too every now and then. And when you really want to zap somebody $2000, LN won't let you. You might have the funds in your LN wallet but the other won't have the inbound capacity.",
  "sig": "1e8607807ca3e48cef66967819eabff47a09ba8e4cec9df5039b3913f86ea4a517d870ee5e3dd0931394022acb64f981ce9b235400a6ebdd3b88ab0003a423be"
}