The api (local api to my understanding) deciding the complex...

Leo Wandersleb

npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6

hex

0fb6abb0b31ab64b0538af6c6c3a4d56bcd0f742b3528dab7ddb75ad20009347

nevent

nevent1qqsqld4tkze34djtq5u27mrv8fx4d0xs7aptx55d4d7akaddyqqfx3cprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsydl97xpj74udw0qg5vkfyujyjxd3l706jd0t0w0turp93d0vvungvsucl0

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-02-21T19:51:48Z

↳ Reply to d22bcdb1... (npub16g4umvwj2pduqc8kt2rv6heq2vhvtulyrsr2a20d4suldwnkl4hquekv4h)

I wonder if it would be better if "premium" were kind of a reverse in the scoring logic. Instead of looking for complexity indicators and giving it Op...

The api (local api to my understanding) deciding the complexity is consuming not only the last message but the full context, so if I write "5+6" I might want to see "11" but I might refer to a list and have picked the 5th and 6th option which in turn are really complex in the context of more messages before that and so on.

I have no idea how this could possibly work - and fast so.

To reverse the logic you would probably implement it from scratch.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "0fb6abb0b31ab64b0538af6c6c3a4d56bcd0f742b3528dab7ddb75ad20009347",
  "pubkey": "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
  "created_at": 1771703508,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "239869f01ce7c636fa9978ca0ae504494c5ca5b790f75e5dbce7d5d07fe63ee3",
      "wss://relay.primal.net",
      "root",
      "d22bcdb1d2505bc060f65a86cd5f20532ec5f3e41c06aea9edac39f6ba76fd6e"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "2c9916ce39fdb7f3a146ca0212c5ddd1fdbd363cb3e4998d5b897789425b8316",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "reply",
      "d22bcdb1d2505bc060f65a86cd5f20532ec5f3e41c06aea9edac39f6ba76fd6e"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "d22bcdb1d2505bc060f65a86cd5f20532ec5f3e41c06aea9edac39f6ba76fd6e"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "jumble"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "The api (local api to my understanding) deciding the complexity is consuming not only the last message but the full context, so if I write \"5+6\" I might want to see \"11\" but I might refer to a list and have picked the 5th and 6th option which in turn are really complex in the context of more messages before that  and so on.\n\nI have no idea how this could possibly work - and fast so.\n\nTo reverse the logic you would probably implement it from scratch.",
  "sig": "9d944e800eea8fbdd5056891db77550db4ba37022f6f10bd4670b31a6b7d7a92424f7cc8221e7fc8d79d49ad6bfc15ce9e7275a368ed6be39a5353bb7243e116"
}