Here's a pathological scenario:

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "15fae4b31280db7133c9beba057fef39bd02a341e7de5b002303a4a2505b19c1",
  "pubkey": "7b3f7803750746f455413a221f80965eecb69ef308f2ead1da89cc2c8912e968",
  "created_at": 1784686300,
  "tags": [
    [
      "r",
      "wss://bitcoiner.social/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nos.lol/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nostr.oxtr.dev/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://premium.primal.net/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.highlighter.com/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.noderunners.network/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nostr.mom/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Primal Web"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Here's a pathological scenario:\n\nLet's call the BIP110 enforcing chain Coin A and the non-enforcing chain, which very well may be longer, Coin B\n\nThe two chains split. Coin A trades at 100:1 Coin B. Miner buys 1000 Coin A for 10 Coin B and then starts mining on the BIP110-enforcing chain afterwards. Coin B chain get wiped out when enough miners do this and the BIP110-enforcing chain gets longer than the non-enforcing chain. Not only did the miner gain 1000 BTC on the now single chain, the 10 BTC that was spent is returned because it's no longer a valid tx on the now-single chain!\n\nGame-theory wise, this is extremely profitable, depending on the price ratio. For me, this will be a test of how optimized for game theory miners are.",
  "sig": "c69f47b9ea8eb50d0f70ed9549666d66935c928ff005caf3417cfb4e2dac6233a038ce67133e83a03b43007324c5d273104a18a84559bc133ec087c36b316349"
}