Fair enough. But if you’ve followed the debates around spam,...

Tauri

npub1x9q89st049pnuym57ch9kqkgzcu5dmff32wduwc4g9gnc2w3nlls8hcsg7

hex

19fd979a4c7fb509cb4c4308e083ad4f3b64aaa95a08373a2a3f3e5362139d46

nevent

nevent1qqspnlvhnfx8ldgfedxyxz8qswk57wmy42545zph8g4r70jnvgfe63sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsrzsrjc9h6jse7zd60vtjmqtypvw2xa55c48x78v25z5fu98gellcvpu6xu

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-02-10T21:32:24Z

↳ 回复 Leo Wandersleb (npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6)

If Core would be doing anything I would consider dangerous on a technical level, I would agree with you but they got other stuff to do than to not be ...

Fair enough. But if you’ve followed the debates around spam, filters, and the OP_RETURN expansion as long as I have, you start noticing that even their technical justifications don’t hold up. They regularly contradict positions they themselves argued a few years ago, or quietly shift the goalposts once inconsistencies get exposed.

A perfect example was when they were pressed on whether changing documentation counts as legitimately “fixing” a bug. They said yes right after a user caught them making a stealth edit to a description file to retroactively justify code behavior that surprised everyone.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "19fd979a4c7fb509cb4c4308e083ad4f3b64aaa95a08373a2a3f3e5362139d46",
  "pubkey": "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
  "created_at": 1770759144,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "dfcea7e09ae2a5c2edad284f536419c79abf52604eb5cae76e3f895ed0f4b3eb",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "13b6ecb12b246ccbd3539349b15f679eeac20b183e2eb99111a68e0a2af9b26b",
      "",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "bd402c1b205e1ccce96a50f9f63bd6337eb8e778735050387f0151fbb6d5143b",
      "",
      "mention"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Fair enough. But if you’ve followed the debates around spam, filters, and the OP_RETURN expansion as long as I have, you start noticing that even their technical justifications don’t hold up. They regularly contradict positions they themselves argued a few years ago, or quietly shift the goalposts once inconsistencies get exposed.\n\nA perfect example was when they were pressed on whether changing documentation counts as legitimately “fixing” a bug. They said yes right after a user caught them making a stealth edit to a description file to retroactively justify code behavior that surprised everyone.",
  "sig": "6d67edb71e2ff4d18b449c46b1854aade629dfc2080767346208c0de8d27a03d926df817a5b365eb9d41ed1143f3df0cc87f0fac5c5b3526f9d262d0df607a74"
}