By Dr. Jack Kruse on X:
On day before my talk nostr:npub167n5w6cj2wseqtmk26zllc7n28uv9c4vw28k2kht206vnghe5a7stgzu3r on the Fabians inside the Gates ...
By Dr. Jack Kruse on X:
On day before my talk nostr:npub167n5w6cj2wseqtmk26zllc7n28uv9c4vw28k2kht206vnghe5a7stgzu3r on the Fabians inside the Gates I was asked by Natalie Brunell to do a podcast with her. At the end of it she asked me what I was going to do and say. I told her to come to the talk and hear it live.
During the podcast she asked me was this an existential challenge to Bitcoin. I told her I would answer that in my talk.
I was just informed that after my presentation at nostr:npub167n5w6cj2wseqtmk26zllc7n28uv9c4vw28k2kht206vnghe5a7stgzu3r Natalie wants to censor my podcast and not release it. I believe all the Plebs should be made aware of this development.
Bitcoin media should not be in the business of sheltering their wedding guests from criticisms. Sunshine is the best disinfectant for the the node running Plebs around the globe.
So in the first every Bitcoin morbidity & mortality conference in Prague, where I labeled 5 of 6 "Bitcoiners," and I use that term lightly, FRAUDS, Natalie Brunell has decided to censor what I told her 24 hours before that talk. Ironically, her team never reached out to me, she relayed the message to the meeting organizers who contacted me this AM about this.
For those of you who did not go to Prague, from the stage Natalie got a big call out on her question from the stage to me about the "existential Bitcoin Landauer attack" brought about by those "6 Bitcoiners". When the talk goes live you'll hear it and she'll have to explain her reasoning to you. For me, she has lost all face validity as Bitcoin media.
I have a clean copy of the Prague talk, so if it gets edited I will be releasing it, FYI. I was wearing my own mic. I knew this talk would be censored in some way so I was ready for it. 7 of my slides also never got shown. I have been reasured that this was a technical issue, so I will not say more about it. Plebs should be away that the media heads inside of Bitcoin are also working with Fabians attempting to ossify the base chain of Bitcoin with spam.
We all must be aware that we have a Trojan horse loaded with people we should no longer trust at our gates, and I strongly suggest we not open the door before we employ BIP-110 to limit the pathologic cloud surrounding them at the entrance.
The primary purpose of Bitcoin media regarding transparency is to hold power to account, foster an informed citizenry, and maintain public trust through clear disclosures and open communication. The media facilitates transparency in two distinct ways: the media’s transparency toward the public and the media acting as an agent of transparency for society.
To combat misinformation and build trust, media & their associated organizations apply transparency to their own operations by employing the following:
1. Editorial Clarity: Distinguishing facts from opinions and explaining reporting methods.
Funding & Ownership Disclosure: Revealing financial backers, corporate ownership, and potential conflicts of interest so audiences can weigh potential biases.
Radical Transparency: Openly revealing how news is gathered to let audiences independently assess the reliability of a story.
As far as I am concerned, based on those three characteristics, Brunell is now part of the same problem now because of this censorship. I spread missing information that Plebs who run nodes need. I find it more than ironic her first released podcast was with a past wedding guest. Is the ethos in Bitcoin, "Don't Trust, verify, or do certain Bitcoiner's get a pass now? Apparently Bitcoin is not for everyone as Brunell's twitter page says in the header. It is just for those who she protects.
