I honestly don't like the checksum part. If I input a wrong ...

YODL

npub162zpxufpw8pnuytaf0gfxzkqtvk9rvcwkvppa7x57y3n7qkfpg4shatdhy

hex

2822505463f41bc8d409f86d09f2ee74fb8e8bab1c16d4a0cb6570a2fe85422d

nevent

nevent1qqszsgjs233lgx7g6sylsmgf7th8f7uw3w43c9k55r9k2u9zl6z5ytgprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsd9pqnwyshrse7z975h5ynptq9ktz3kv8txqs7lr20zgelqtys52cgptyhl

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-08T02:53:58Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

9c38e301a0cf9d8648ea7a549337c8611404a3c3f119bbeef4939b5528a040e6...

I honestly don't like the checksum part. If I input a wrong seed phrase, then I won't see any funds. That's all the checking I need to know I should try again. Sure, it can sometimes be handy, but I think it was just a clever use for the extra bits without regard for the whole COMPLETELY offline secret generation taken into consideration (which I value far more). What's the safest way to do a checksum without risk of leaking, in your opinion? I know you included a script here, but as someone who has no cyber security knowledge, that seems scary. Like you said, it'd be nice if HWW let me enter 23 words and display for me the remaining possible 8. Do none of them do this? I would prefer this, plus it would let me do simple coin flips which is easy to understand.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "2822505463f41bc8d409f86d09f2ee74fb8e8bab1c16d4a0cb6570a2fe85422d",
  "pubkey": "d28413712171c33e117d4bd0930ac05b2c51b30eb3021ef8d4f1233f02c90a2b",
  "created_at": 1786157638,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "9e611d640539d3ea20412f15e868d14c5a48e971e0ed0c339b844f0467d00b35",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "c4368c512e70e36558fa167967cd73fc83a8a907ea38b3ed68358fcbdfab0da6"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "9c38e301a0cf9d8648ea7a549337c8611404a3c3f119bbeef4939b5528a040e6",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "reply",
      "c4368c512e70e36558fa167967cd73fc83a8a907ea38b3ed68358fcbdfab0da6"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "0d97beae567fcec9c6574f1c6ef6126ea969d4992c3198e51c0fac52c5274a14"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "c4368c512e70e36558fa167967cd73fc83a8a907ea38b3ed68358fcbdfab0da6"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "I honestly don't like the checksum part. If I input a wrong seed phrase, then I won't see any funds. That's all the checking I need to know I should try again. Sure, it can sometimes be handy, but I think it was just a clever use for the extra bits without regard for the whole COMPLETELY offline secret generation taken into consideration (which I value far more).\nWhat's the safest way to do a checksum without risk of leaking, in your opinion? I know you included a script here, but as someone who has no cyber security knowledge, that seems scary. Like you said, it'd be nice if HWW let me enter 23 words and display for me the remaining possible 8. Do none of them do this? I would prefer this, plus it would let me do simple coin flips which is easy to understand.",
  "sig": "76fbcbf5cf2443cef23b261196cf187bf86471b819a2ea15a07d17210e67929dc76864930e9b7258636fcbab8b5f4a9da40fbf62f83282919ea8108a91605f1b"
}