(I think I've read all the replies by you in this [assuming ...

SatsAndSports

npub1zthq85gksjsjthv8h6rec2qeqs2mu0emrm9xknkhgw7hfl7csrnq6wxm56

hex

2c61336daecfb09af152891abe320f574d2984f1c9003f9507572a4d9cf670f5

nevent

nevent1qqszccfndkhvlvy679fgjx47xg84wnffsncujqplj5r4w2jdnnm8pagprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsp9msr6ytgfgf9mkrmapuu9qvsg9d78ua3ajntfmt580t5llvgpes74hrhm

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-14T13:05:34Z

↳ Reply to Event not found

c042d82324ec1c6f9a3f9671605d048f8e639903ffa5ab518efafa78f88a48f2...

(I think I've read all the replies by you in this [assuming my client is finding and rendering them all correctly])

You refer elsewhere to your desire for more variety of Bitcoin network clients. But that will just bring relay closer to consensus, so you better be prepared for the consequences 😀.

There will always be people (like me) who are happy to be more tolerant, such as relaying OP_RETURNs, when we believe the filters are harming the small miners. (You might think we have made the wrong judgement, but we do exist and we will take action)

Secondly, miners want to earn fees, and therefore they will connect to the nodes that give them fee-paying transactions

Therefore, the de facto relay policy will be the policy of the few dozen nodes that are more relaxed, if the miners connect to them.

Relay policy isn't a democracy. Relay policy isn't even controlled by the economics nodes. Relay policy is controlled by the relaxed nodes and the relaxed miners

If you have a goal to keep relay policy far from consensus, i.e. to have lots of filters, then you need to be very realistic. People like me will fight the filters, if we believe it's necessary to help the small miners, and there isn't much you can do about it

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "2c61336daecfb09af152891abe320f574d2984f1c9003f9507572a4d9cf670f5",
  "pubkey": "12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6",
  "created_at": 1786712734,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "33099fb3af94de49ac524ae7343f07c4faf7ba7f276c6f95e423e478a6ad9b94",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "root",
      "f527cf970ce260e74261214bf612e8f75a59db1835ed7e4053326c3f65e232ee"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "c042d82324ec1c6f9a3f9671605d048f8e639903ffa5ab518efafa78f88a48f2",
      "wss://nostr-01.yakihonne.com/",
      "reply",
      "f527cf970ce260e74261214bf612e8f75a59db1835ed7e4053326c3f65e232ee"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "f527cf970ce260e74261214bf612e8f75a59db1835ed7e4053326c3f65e232ee"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "(I think I've read all the replies by you in this [assuming my client is finding and rendering them all correctly])\n\nYou refer elsewhere to your desire for more variety of Bitcoin network clients. But that will just bring relay closer to consensus, so you better be prepared for the consequences 😀.\n\nThere will always be people (like me) who are happy to be more tolerant, such as relaying OP_RETURNs, when we believe the filters are harming the small miners. (You might think we have made the wrong judgement, but we do exist and we will take action)\n\nSecondly, miners want to earn fees, and therefore they will connect to the nodes that give them fee-paying transactions\n\nTherefore, the *de facto* relay policy will be the policy of the few dozen nodes that are more relaxed, if the miners connect to them.\n\nRelay policy isn't a democracy. Relay policy isn't even controlled by the economics nodes. Relay policy is controlled by the *relaxed* nodes and the *relaxed* miners\n\nIf you have a goal to keep relay policy far from consensus, i.e. to have lots of filters, then you need to be very realistic. People like me will fight the filters, if we believe it's necessary to help the small miners, and there isn't much you can do about it",
  "sig": "853f808c26aedd09e99d1c71721b658d58eab8d1618ae8f9060582affd6e1368146e9b6108f037468323d3dcd529194af4b0be5d3d5e3d06613db6e8deaf7639"
}