I see. Misunderstood what you meant. I tend to take a minima...

Matt - Not Your Entropy, Not Your Coins

npub1l6scds4yv7xmcsmhqnhdy9sggm520q09lvts2m5mkvecgr2mmmeqsuj5rc

hex

2cf9c925c763a42b897f9b416dc7cf63e54b3b9c493e7dfce3c97e6dd3d9bfe4

nevent

nevent1qqsze7wfyhrk8fpt39lekstdcl8k8e2t8wwyj0naln3ujlnd60vmleqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs0agvxc2jx0rdugdmsfmkjzcyyd698s8jlk9c9d6dmxvuyp4daauszkg5kh

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-11T02:13:47Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

0000ecc5f3b4b0b46c5a6dd12a8c160820f2c604292a5aebf6ffac7181b89918...

I see. Misunderstood what you meant. I tend to take a minimalist approach. Do the bare minimum required for a secure and robust monetary network.

But there's also the Genesis block. It had arbitrary data. So this issue predates all of us. It's hard to argue that our vision was the original. But I'm also not one who deifies Satoshi or even the original network. I think it's rational to improve it and learn from design choices after the fact.

I don't agree that data is never useful in transactions. I think that's obviously untrue. I've made payments that contained unique order details, for example. Could we solve that some other way? Maybe, but that's beyond me.

It's unclear to me that Bitcoin is doomed for any of these things. And if it were truly, it isnt like we couldn't make changes. This is why I avoid catastrophizing. We all think our vision is the best.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "2cf9c925c763a42b897f9b416dc7cf63e54b3b9c493e7dfce3c97e6dd3d9bfe4",
  "pubkey": "fea186c2a4678dbc437704eed2160846e8a781e5fb17056e9bb333840d5bdef2",
  "created_at": 1786414427,
  "tags": [
    [
      "p",
      "fea186c2a4678dbc437704eed2160846e8a781e5fb17056e9bb333840d5bdef2",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "0689df5847a8d3376892da29622d7c0fdc1ef1958f4bc4471d90966aa1eca9f2",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "0000016a1e7bb30e6f2bb519f1de4eb029f9e18e3e7cf2c0b757d6d02a4f4fdb",
      "",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "0000ecc5f3b4b0b46c5a6dd12a8c160820f2c604292a5aebf6ffac7181b89918",
      "",
      "reply"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "I see. Misunderstood what you meant. I tend to take a minimalist approach. Do the bare minimum required for a secure and robust monetary network.\n\nBut there's also the Genesis block. It had arbitrary data. So this issue predates all of us. It's hard to argue that our vision was the original. But I'm also not one who deifies Satoshi or even the original network. I think it's rational to improve it and learn from design choices after the fact.\n\nI don't agree that data is never useful in transactions. I think that's obviously untrue. I've made payments that contained unique order details, for example. Could we solve that some other way? Maybe, but that's beyond me.\n\nIt's unclear to me that Bitcoin is doomed for any of these things. And if it were truly, it isnt like we couldn't make changes. This is why I avoid catastrophizing. We all think our vision is the best.",
  "sig": "3b5c75fb7511549f8d09b54c3b8cfacaddebf02f7ee641443c7bfc14bbae80fa81afbf034232397c351837400b71cae8fc447c4f6af90b091698204380057b5b"
}