It's pretty important information because it indicates that ...

Cykros

npub1lcetwt8hcd9gagdytu4e35ufykxek0elfvx8q3spugmgj9x0ev0q363apw

hex

47b3fc13fdf24eda1779b9aac1c98d890b8c364091c7e8ddb10602938f40bdae

nevent

nevent1qqsy0vluz07lynk6zaumn2kpexxcjzuvxeqfr3lgmkcsvq5n3aqtmtsprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs0uv4h9nmuxj5w5xj972uc6wyjtrvm8ul5krrsgcq7yd5fzn8uk8sstzdkp

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-13T11:45:43Z

↳ Reply to Event not found

66fb5aab5ba48c63f8b7a3e314e43c9af4e05d875c24a99f55c41a71cfa03ddd...

It's pretty important information because it indicates that for all the fanfare about BIP-148 it was starting from a stance where many miners were already onboard, rather than the <1% in the case of 110. Indicating that the chainsplit, rather than being one thriving and one DOA, would have been a substantial split where both chains actually produced blocks (albeit both of them substantially slower for a little while until they hit a difficulty adjustment). There's also the matter of the rationale for objecting to Segwit having been something a lot more trivial, given the firmware based advantage Bitmain had with covert AsicBoost, rather than turning away a large portion of fee paying transactions at the request of a loud minority of nodes which don't account for a large portion of the economic activity on Bitcoin (thus neither generating a large number of fees nor placing a particularly large bid under the asset -- effectively being negligible in the event that they split off, and also mostly likely to just give up and return to the main chain when they do).

And the website isn't new; he just has that redirect url to get to that dashboard to save time as it has been one of his more popular ones.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "47b3fc13fdf24eda1779b9aac1c98d890b8c364091c7e8ddb10602938f40bdae",
  "pubkey": "fe32b72cf7c34a8ea1a45f2b98d389258d9b3f3f4b0c704601e2368914cfcb1e",
  "created_at": 1783943143,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "14796ed8dad0bc642079ed5352d365ec991fcb652481dbd8aab97b0178a7a1c2",
      "wss://relay.mostr.pub/",
      "root",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "fe32b72cf7c34a8ea1a45f2b98d389258d9b3f3f4b0c704601e2368914cfcb1e",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "ab0451c71a6e1a60fbb7dea598b743c8ce68f01f87c6c4d3777435b8216f8b9b",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "66fb5aab5ba48c63f8b7a3e314e43c9af4e05d875c24a99f55c41a71cfa03ddd",
      "",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "It's pretty important information because it indicates that for all the fanfare about BIP-148 it was starting from a stance where many miners were already onboard, rather than the \u003c1% in the case of 110. Indicating that the chainsplit, rather than being one thriving and one DOA, would have been a substantial split where both chains actually produced blocks (albeit both of them substantially slower for a little while until they hit a difficulty adjustment). There's also the matter of the rationale for objecting to Segwit having been something a lot more trivial, given the firmware based advantage Bitmain had with covert AsicBoost, rather than turning away a large portion of fee paying transactions at the request of a loud minority of nodes which don't account for a large portion of the economic activity on Bitcoin (thus neither generating a large number of fees nor placing a particularly large bid under the asset -- effectively being negligible in the event that they split off, and also mostly likely to just give up and return to the main chain when they do).\n\nAnd the website isn't new; he just has that redirect url to get to that dashboard to save time as it has been one of his more popular ones. ",
  "sig": "313faa2894c0b010d33d69691c5ed7db3e5e244ca5d9b9e8e52eed2bca1daa6faa9ff841b460edd0fb45ba7eecd38cc4b5c68345469824ec5908a0da770229ca"
}