Without reading the details of the Arbitrarium case, how doe...

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "481363d5a49585fb14398202722a763acb1518e0aacf671167aff3016d90e9c5",
  "pubkey": "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
  "created_at": 1776777509,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "aa7a536baf93160bb2aaf55129b767cb694c60c1f5ceda5b9128cdc00a03dd84",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "root",
      "675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "f728d9e6e7048358e70930f5ca64b097770d989ccd86854fe618eda9c8a38106"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "jumble"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Without reading the details of the Arbitrarium case, how does \"council decided ... to award confiscated coins to other people than the recipients according to protocol rules\" have anything to do with a Bitcoin fork where every user can follow the fork or not ... or both ... at their own discretion?\n\nBitcoin's rules can be changed and people who fancy the changed rules can run a node enforcing those. To argue whether \"we\" should change the rules is moot. There is no \"we\".\n\nShould a coin-freezing chain have value? Also moot.\n\nShould \"lost\" coins sponsor a quantum frenzy while diluting the Bitcoin supply? Also moot.",
  "sig": "8346c0216faa69d1ee9a70567782f1a2897d6fc2d3dbe464e1eb302630a64799e90835680ff7a7690a8a851be8162f4cf5296d22f8a087421fcfcd6749232fe9"
}