one nuance to this: when one says "meritocracy" in reality w...

32e1827635450ebb...

npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s

hex

5080669789be0e95663356cecad0855a40d5a24176deecd5ace78d6ec1222de4

nevent

nevent1qqs9pqrxj7ymur54vce4dnk26zz45sx45fqhdhhv6kkw0rtwcy3zmeqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsr9cvzwc652r4m83d86ykplrnm9dg5gwdvzzn8ameanlvut35wy3gncppwq

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-02-08T23:37:11Z

one nuance to this: when one says "meritocracy" in reality what you're really doing is subscribing to a core-dev "web of trust" (since nostr:npub1u5njm6g5h5cpw4wy8xugu62e5s7f6fnysv0sj0z3a8rengt2zqhsxrldq3 nostr:npub1manlnflyzyjhgh970t8mmngrdytcp3jrmaa66u846ggg7t20cgqqvyn9tn nerd sniped me on decentralized web of trust stuff recently)

if this web of trust (who vouches for who and what they agree on) could be visualized, it might be easier to see what flavor of bitcoin you're getting into (knots, etc) which would have a different web of trust wrt. engineering decisions

how bitcoin evolves is determined by which economic nodes subscribe to which WoT... i think this is the most accurate definition of what bitcoin is and what its future trajectory is?

I currently trust the existing core devs who have made what bitcoin is up to this point, since they have the most experience. luke's WoT is a lot smaller and therefore it's not really safe to join IMO. nostr:note18jzxglk6y5vpvhvkw4n7trz2n97s5q5j9yv2rucwyef24z22ulasmfj0tc

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "5080669789be0e95663356cecad0855a40d5a24176deecd5ace78d6ec1222de4",
  "pubkey": "32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245",
  "created_at": 1770593831,
  "tags": [
    [
      "client",
      "Damus Notedeck"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "e5272de914bd301755c439b88e6959a43c9d2664831f093c51e9c799a16a102f"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "df67f9a7e41125745cbe7acfbdcd03691780c643df7bad70f5d2108f2d4fc200"
    ],
    [
      "q",
      "3c84647eda2518165d967567e58c4a997d0a02922918a1f30e2652aa894ae7fb"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "one nuance to this: when one says \"meritocracy\" in reality what you're really doing is subscribing to a core-dev \"web of trust\" (since nostr:npub1u5njm6g5h5cpw4wy8xugu62e5s7f6fnysv0sj0z3a8rengt2zqhsxrldq3 nostr:npub1manlnflyzyjhgh970t8mmngrdytcp3jrmaa66u846ggg7t20cgqqvyn9tn nerd sniped me on decentralized web of trust stuff recently)\n\nif this web of trust (who vouches for who and what they agree on) could be visualized, it might be easier to see what flavor of bitcoin you're getting into (knots, etc) which would have a different web of trust wrt. engineering decisions\n\nhow bitcoin evolves is determined by which economic nodes subscribe to which WoT... i think this is the most accurate definition of what bitcoin is and what its future trajectory is?\n\nI currently trust the existing core devs who have made what bitcoin is up to this point, since they have the most experience. luke's WoT is a lot smaller and therefore it's not really safe to join IMO.\nnostr:note18jzxglk6y5vpvhvkw4n7trz2n97s5q5j9yv2rucwyef24z22ulasmfj0tc",
  "sig": "d53b1f825e62e56166f01e3438ce82a448d6f6832a364551a666639da97caba0baebbca8081138b348ecad8c329e937f823f33ae5b78bd7e0964fc194fb46e02"
}