I'll admit that's something to explain if you'll admit that ...

vinney...axkl

npub19ma2w9dmk3kat0nt0k5dwuqzvmg3va9ezwup0zkakhpwv0vcwvcsg8axkl

hex

5473c0abb3fe940b483af7ff326eb916fc14e15ad2696cc9d452ae37636d3aa8

nevent

nevent1qqs9gu7q4wela9qtfqa00lejd6u3dlq5u9ddy6tve8299t3hvdkn42qprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsza748zkamgmw4he4hm2xhwqpxd5gkwju38wqh3twmtshx8kv8xvg3k0v3k

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-05-22T14:31:42Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

458041377328ea9ba71228c9ef0c90be77b4bbb13c01502e737dc989a6e1a5c0...

I'll admit that's something to explain if you'll admit that the Fox news guy's face, lips, eyebrows, facial muscles etc. look nothing like the same on the british mask guy's face.

if you'll concede that, then the world we're in is: "good mask tech exists. the british video proves it. the Fox news guy's face is very much more life-like (essentially indistinguishable), so the available mask tech is many multiples better than what 'we're being shown'. Okay - so they can pull off basically perfect faces, BUT when they're using the 100x better mask tech, they just get super careless around the neck... meanwhile, the crappy-looking british mask includes a simple bib down the front that easily solves the neck line issue."

This just strikes me as extremely unbelievable. Making the super advanced mask 100% unnoticeable by plebs on nostr would only require extending it a few inches longer - which is already the norm on much shittier masks in evidence - but they don't do it because....?

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "5473c0abb3fe940b483af7ff326eb916fc14e15ad2696cc9d452ae37636d3aa8",
  "pubkey": "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
  "created_at": 1779460302,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "016a3a86549d97d978855a63e795a5337154f79c589c8db7f9aacfd6f59bf615",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "046990634363739961d3afa4fc2241d6f665acd124a23fc189ac704d74e4d092"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "458041377328ea9ba71228c9ef0c90be77b4bbb13c01502e737dc989a6e1a5c0",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "reply",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "I'll admit that's something to explain if you'll admit that the Fox news guy's face, lips, eyebrows, facial muscles etc. look nothing like the same on the british mask guy's face.\n\nif you'll concede that, then the world we're in is: \"good mask tech exists. the british video proves it. the Fox news guy's face is very much more life-like (essentially indistinguishable), so the available mask tech is many multiples better than what 'we're being shown'. Okay - so they _can_ pull off basically perfect faces, BUT when they're using the 100x better mask tech, they just get super careless around the neck... meanwhile, the crappy-looking british mask includes a simple bib down the front that easily solves the neck line issue.\"\n\nThis just strikes me as extremely unbelievable. Making the super advanced mask 100% unnoticeable by plebs on nostr would only require extending it a few inches longer - which is already the norm on much shittier masks in evidence - but they don't do it because....?",
  "sig": "6d4fee6710497f3c667a8a88799480738bf50fc5b2ef7a6a80e2a4c8c97e3138ba315cc35211adc06da4413e546f76647e6c3fd407e5592be25ca52d8b306665"
}