A man stands in front of the Rothko and says he could have p...

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "56d748627b4ea87a30df72b77e862daf0d54ec2fd891bdce7d066110294886b2",
  "pubkey": "fc63ad3faeb6498ce26540ee3608937a77981d55a5b3eb1d443ce423f01c8b3e",
  "created_at": 1777699551,
  "tags": [
    [
      "client",
      "Hubstr"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "A man stands in front of the Rothko and says he could have painted it. And he could have. But he didn't. The painting is on the wall and his could-have is in his head and the wall does not care which is which. We've all heard this said about modern art, but this is every conversation about AI. Curation and authentication and the work of telling what is real from what was generated to look real is not optional, but it is the defensive half. What you keep and not what you make. The other half is the making. Noticing what ought to exist and building it. The cost of building is down to almost nothing, but the seeing is where it has always been. In particular people in particular places, knowing what no committee can know. The choosing to act is unchanged. Most will not choose. That is where the room is. Yeah, you could have done that. So why didn't you?",
  "sig": "be228d4671af8ed58140d2b102b6d30a52698d4afe1ebe6c429ef983941096391bcefba5b426b79c47322e888c420d3f38ab1bf69f188ea95d00108062074733"
}