Maybe I’m missing something, but the censorship debate aroun...

⚡️ᗪㄖ匚⚡️

npub1xy54p83r6wnpyhs52xjeztd7qyyeu9ghymz8v66yu8kt3jzx75rqhf3urc

hex

5c62403665e8fe961f49a99c3baeb630b3c41420fc604519292ef1201adc5b57

nevent

nevent1qqs9ccjqxej73l5kray6n8pm46mrpv7yzss0ccz9ry5jaufqrtw9k4cprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsrz22snc3a8fsjtc29rfv39klqzzv7z5tjd3rkddzwrm9cepr02psw709y2

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-05-31T13:17:16Z

Maybe I’m missing something, but the censorship debate around Primal feels mostly like noise.

If a client is censoring users and you don’t like it, switch clients. That’s kind of the whole point of Nostr.

What seems far more important is whether Nostr’s biggest client is built on a design that becomes increasingly incompatible with the rest of the network.

More clients are moving to an outbox model and relying on NIP-65 relay lists. If I publish only to my own relay and advertise it there, will Primal users see my notes? Does Primal plan to support that model, or does the caching architecture become harder to maintain as more clients adopt outbox?

nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg what’s the long-term plan here? nostr:nevent1qqsqlh65wry77z96p56zgnzmj39nqxevcrfvzumtft7t0pfw5l9d6mszyqewrqnkx4zsaweutf739s0cu7et29zrntqs5elw70vlm8zudr3y2qcyqqqqqqgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdusulckj

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "5c62403665e8fe961f49a99c3baeb630b3c41420fc604519292ef1201adc5b57",
  "pubkey": "3129509e23d3a6125e1451a5912dbe01099e151726c4766b44e1ecb8c846f506",
  "created_at": 1780233436,
  "tags": [
    [
      "q",
      "0fdf5470c9ef08ba0d34244c5b944b301b2cc0d2c1736b4afcb7852ea7cadd6e",
      "wss://relay.damus.io",
      "32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "532d830dffe09c13e75e8b145c825718fc12b0003f61d61e9077721c7fff93cb"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Nostur",
      "31990:9be0be0fc079548233231614e4e1efc9f28b0db398011efeecf05fe570e5dd33:1685868693432"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Maybe I’m missing something, but the censorship debate around Primal feels mostly like noise.\n\nIf a client is censoring users and you don’t like it, switch clients. That’s kind of the whole point of Nostr.\n\nWhat seems far more important is whether Nostr’s biggest client is built on a design that becomes increasingly incompatible with the rest of the network.\n\nMore clients are moving to an outbox model and relying on NIP-65 relay lists. If I publish only to my own relay and advertise it there, will Primal users see my notes? Does Primal plan to support that model, or does the caching architecture become harder to maintain as more clients adopt outbox?\n\nnostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg what’s the long-term plan here? \nnostr:nevent1qqsqlh65wry77z96p56zgnzmj39nqxevcrfvzumtft7t0pfw5l9d6mszyqewrqnkx4zsaweutf739s0cu7et29zrntqs5elw70vlm8zudr3y2qcyqqqqqqgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdusulckj",
  "sig": "ad76b4e53aaf1041ae7b2c7ecb561c42628302ddaa95a07e26e784e16924f99923affba7bd7413f5b48e70434a249865f989b7ee04782eee9c002f3417c27719"
}