This is false:

npub1zthq85gksjsjthv8h6rec2qeqs2mu0emrm9xknkhgw7hfl7csrnq6wxm56
hex
5cb87a42941c16371fe969f60717007d613455beee3fc8cb1105f4cb28e89d0bnevent
nevent1qqs9ewr6g22pc93hrl5knas8zuq86cf52klwu07gevgstaxt9r5f6zcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsp9msr6ytgfgf9mkrmapuu9qvsg9d78ua3ajntfmt580t5llvgpesgyzyk5Kind-1 (TextNote)
↳ Reply to Event not found
0812f76b82b04e3b66a36c68bc875b07d46c87a7a0e3bfdd483f5bad497ed6f1...
This is false:
"Then, Tim Bouma made a major breakthrough."
There's an obvious flaw (with, I think, an easy fix) in Tim's proposal. You know this already. It will allow anybody who offers SP-scanning services the ability to steal the funds and the nsec and the identity
Everyone who really understands SP knows how to derive an SP from a Nostr key pair (and how to do it in a way that's safer than Tim's). Those experts don't need Tim's sloppy proposal and sloppy code. It didn't add anything to the discussion
The problem with you and Tim isn't that you make mistakes. We all do, and I've made cryptographic mistakes. It's that you double down after your mistakes are pointed out. Tim (and you) could have humbly said "I withdraw my original proposal, as it's crap, and I'd like to learn how to fix it". Many of us would have loved to help
Raw JSON
{
"kind": 1,
"id": "5cb87a42941c16371fe969f60717007d613455beee3fc8cb1105f4cb28e89d0b",
"pubkey": "12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6",
"created_at": 1779782575,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: This is false:\n\n\"Then, Tim Bouma made a major brea..."
],
[
"e",
"0812f76b82b04e3b66a36c68bc875b07d46c87a7a0e3bfdd483f5bad497ed6f1",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub/",
"root",
"0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd"
],
[
"p",
"0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd",
"wss://relay.primal.net/"
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "This is false:\n\n\"Then, Tim Bouma made a major breakthrough.\"\n\nThere's an obvious flaw (with, I think, an easy fix) in Tim's proposal. You know this already. It will allow anybody who offers SP-scanning services the ability to steal the funds and the nsec and the identity\n\nEveryone who really understands SP knows how to derive an SP from a Nostr key pair (and how to do it in a way that's safer than Tim's). Those experts don't need Tim's sloppy proposal and sloppy code. It didn't add anything to the discussion\n\nThe problem with you and Tim isn't that you make mistakes. We all do, and I've made cryptographic mistakes. It's that you double down after your mistakes are pointed out. Tim (and you) could have humbly said \"I withdraw my original proposal, as it's crap, and I'd like to learn how to fix it\". Many of us would have loved to help",
"sig": "e727ffb0dca8f1340c85ac1abf27e012dcef34c6485a07014f57b913e5feb624131fc1bec25eef1531304d17417f99a14936888c2f88f66d8de4ea45560765ea"
}