Vitor or maybe it was jb mentioned private replies recently....

YODL

npub162zpxufpw8pnuytaf0gfxzkqtvk9rvcwkvppa7x57y3n7qkfpg4shatdhy

hex

60578afd037e3caac37c5112f5256245722a95f4cde25857aa412dffae1c864f

nevent

nevent1qqsxq4u2l5phu092cd79zyh4y43y2u32jh6vmcjc274yzt0l4cwgvncprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsd9pqnwyshrse7z975h5ynptq9ktz3kv8txqs7lr20zgelqtys52c55sgjy

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-01-24T20:26:21Z

↳ 回复 mike (npub1aqakd28d95muqlg6h6nwrvqq5925n354prayckr424k49vzjds4s0c237n)

You'd need a walled garden for that. Anybody with or without a public key can read anything.

Vitor or maybe it was jb mentioned private replies recently. I like the idea in theory. Seems some sort of DH scheme could work for this easily enough, but not sure about ANY of the details (hesitate to even mention "DH scheme" as I scarcely understand what it is). There are times when I'd wanna potentially share a bit more in a group thread than I do, knowing that's it's fully public. In those cases it would be nice to toggle on a "only current participants of this thread" feature, but I ain't gonna build it (nor can I).

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "60578afd037e3caac37c5112f5256245722a95f4cde25857aa412dffae1c864f",
  "pubkey": "d28413712171c33e117d4bd0930ac05b2c51b30eb3021ef8d4f1233f02c90a2b",
  "created_at": 1769286381,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "c148848defe871783db9fed5a2206f0f873ae60a7682804886a3808423c3fee7",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "b2eef62239550d2d4fcc34b435dc4c39c7edacf92bf311d899aa48069453ab92",
      "wss://aggr.nostr.land",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "14ec0a311d7f2140d28923e6e797da836d8f6e308f58d491844b8631c79ea4de"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "4c800257a588a82849d049817c2bdaad984b25a45ad9f6dad66e47d3b47e3b2f"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "de75eb1d7a6627807a8dff0fb337cfcf189e7e9af8ab6229f688f664710c3014"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "e83b66a8ed2d37c07d1abea6e1b000a15549c69508fa4c5875556d52b0526c2b"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Vitor or maybe it was jb mentioned private replies recently. I like the idea in theory. Seems some sort of DH scheme could work for this easily enough, but not sure about ANY of the details (hesitate to even mention \"DH scheme\" as I scarcely understand what it is).\nThere are times when I'd wanna potentially share a bit more in a group thread than I do, knowing that's it's fully public. In those cases it would be nice to toggle on a \"only current participants of this thread\" feature, but I ain't gonna build it (nor can I).",
  "sig": "da5893dcfffc3d42e62335e241b6753105c028d5dff4516524c1f4037739bd55b4bd2d0c967739132e312e3036c632aa0c4ba0696db82a882ab17e1d6f2174c0"
}