there is an exit which your babbling, self-serving evasivene...

Weatherall

npub1ljxdldrq885zamfkn82k7zcjs4lrsf9wykrh9e3hq4thh89vlzxsr83h7d

hex

62b3904acc664c394bdbf411378d15fe4df81f77c9081f4c204472228a68a358

nevent

nevent1qqsx9vusftxxvnpef0dlgyfh352lun0cramujzqlfssygu3z3f52xkqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs0erxlk3srn6pwa5mfn4t0pvfg2l3cyjhztpmjucms24mmnjk03rgypd59q

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-04T17:57:24Z

↳ 回复 Weatherall (npub1ljxdldrq885zamfkn82k7zcjs4lrsf9wykrh9e3hq4thh89vlzxsr83h7d)

wrong. God-given Rights include the Right to Contract... if the bearer of such is too fucking lazy or stupid to avail himself of the rules of the gam...

there is an exit which your babbling, self-serving evasiveness of the original point i was making points at, but I must tear it down for the way you are trying to arrive at it is sus as fuck...

and the exit still demands knowledge of the law, engagement with the process via establishment of Administrative record, and self-defense of such in the courts ESPECIALLY from the vantage point of the U.S. citizen category because the courts PRESUMPTION is that you are what you have said you are and signed off on the contract, LIKE SS, VOTER REG, etc... partly because they are as ignorant as the masses on these subjects....

But I'll give it to ya even though you communicating in bad faith by not admitting your original error... you are looking for Marbury v. Madison, combined with Murdoch v Penn, Shuttlesworth v Virginia and US v. Bishop...

you are welcome.

fffs you people are impossible know it alls.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "62b3904acc664c394bdbf411378d15fe4df81f77c9081f4c204472228a68a358",
  "pubkey": "fc8cdfb46039e82eed3699d56f0b12857e3824ae258772e63705577b9cacf88d",
  "created_at": 1783187844,
  "tags": [
    [
      "p",
      "fc8cdfb46039e82eed3699d56f0b12857e3824ae258772e63705577b9cacf88d",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "adc14fa3ad590856dd8b80815d367f7c1e6735ad00fd98a86d002fbe9fb535e1",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "d4ad3b6eeaff13fe0ccac86d2294049798ae2e397796ada5be3196592e56e2a7",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "8189116a994573b03bf412aebbe63c86ecb141bc68503527240c5c7d0afa5a84",
      "",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "1ae6293cb7fc4cba02d0f6d757b71b01a74c13c3f2545bcd014e6420f5760ecd",
      "",
      "reply"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "there is an exit which your babbling, self-serving evasiveness of the original point i was making points at, but I must tear it down for the way you are trying to arrive at it is sus as fuck...\n\nand the exit still demands knowledge of the law, engagement with the process via establishment of Administrative record, and self-defense of such in the courts ESPECIALLY from the vantage point of the U.S. citizen category because the courts PRESUMPTION is that you are what you have said you are and signed off on the contract, LIKE SS, VOTER REG, etc... partly because they are as ignorant as the masses on these subjects....\n\nBut I'll give it to ya even though you communicating in bad faith by not admitting your original error... you are looking for Marbury v. Madison, combined with Murdoch v Penn, Shuttlesworth v Virginia and US v. Bishop...\n\nyou are welcome.\n\nfffs you people are impossible know it alls. ",
  "sig": "d55ca1d24b47ab8f08ada6d63a62603cab0b385d61beda27548b82424b31e72a90c491eb924d39e82c95db44c78eb0c483ac4a7be2df3e51328684ca82f2e9b6"
}