Very good question, and in many cases, the answer is "not su...

npub1mts2l7rsvgpqxdc8sk39e50fpntw0p7eamq8pp3kek5h6k7qemzq83ueyt
hex
6ec066b7a799a3c1c251067965cffd286a556b3a4a195cb4235c1fb889b858c2nevent
nevent1qqsxasrxk7neng7pcfgsv7t9el7js6j4dvay5x2uks34c8ac3xu93ssprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsd4c90lpcxyqsrxurctgju685se4h8slv7asrsscmvm2tat0qva3qp3jzr8Kind-1 (TextNote)
↳ Reply to Event not found
bcad8e0d0346e6aa8fc4da874f1bae570478ab99cb7de733deaa868d45e11166...
Very good question, and in many cases, the answer is "not sure, the only surviving written records are from their Statist enemies".
Paleontology does a better job than history at answering your question. Freer, tribally-administered societies seem to have been taller, more athletic, suffered less chronic disease, and completely rekt their statist neighbours in war most of the time. For thousands of years, States were well-contained in small, geographically isolated locations like the Nile and Indus valleys.
Statist advantages were in propaganda, and ability to hire the best barbarian warriors with promises of bountiful bling and bitches.
Complex economies are also associated with Statism, but not exclusively - locally high population density makes a society capable of a high degree of specialisation - but also vulnerable to Statism.
Look up James S Scott's books like "Against the Grain" for the book-length version :)
Raw JSON
{
"kind": 1,
"id": "6ec066b7a799a3c1c251067965cffd286a556b3a4a195cb4235c1fb889b858c2",
"pubkey": "dae0aff870620203370785a25cd1e90cd6e787d9eec0708636cda97d5bc0cec4",
"created_at": 1778197003,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: Very good question, and in many cases, the answer ..."
],
[
"e",
"3fd71968ebc85c8e9deb6301cd2b588f6534f906e453b2be2b9921a4c94343ee",
"wss://nostr.mom/",
"root",
"821000569a720e06d6d24092614d1d7db42e88a73cdafffed9387c2de198089f"
],
[
"e",
"f4efdb9aca00feeb892f15752ec5bf9a71c8da78a6509981f548addd48974627",
"wss://relay.primal.net/",
"",
"1fd281598d263f2f94302c1b912bf266b599486f034f1c007965805fbaaa321d"
],
[
"e",
"bcad8e0d0346e6aa8fc4da874f1bae570478ab99cb7de733deaa868d45e11166",
"wss://nostr.mom/",
"reply",
"821000569a720e06d6d24092614d1d7db42e88a73cdafffed9387c2de198089f"
],
[
"p",
"821000569a720e06d6d24092614d1d7db42e88a73cdafffed9387c2de198089f",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"p",
"1fd281598d263f2f94302c1b912bf266b599486f034f1c007965805fbaaa321d",
"wss://nos.lol/"
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "Very good question, and in many cases, the answer is \"not sure, the only surviving written records are from their Statist enemies\".\n\nPaleontology does a better job than history at answering your question. Freer, tribally-administered societies seem to have been taller, more athletic, suffered less chronic disease, and completely rekt their statist neighbours in war most of the time. For thousands of years, States were well-contained in small, geographically isolated locations like the Nile and Indus valleys.\n\nStatist advantages were in propaganda, and ability to hire the best barbarian warriors with promises of bountiful bling and bitches. \n\nComplex economies are also associated with Statism, but not exclusively - locally high population density makes a society capable of a high degree of specialisation - but also vulnerable to Statism.\n\nLook up James S Scott's books like \"Against the Grain\" for the book-length version :)",
"sig": "43f23bde29b160a2cd786443bb84ad308ce2e54e3771ee09888490b4e84893df7d748774fdbe2b7da75ae584888fe08180d62f1194c179acd81b3f86c21c46fb"
}