I enjoyed Jack's talk, albeit he left a lot unsaid and some ...

3c285d830bf43313...

npub18s59mqct7se3xkhxr3epkagvuydwtvhpsacj67shrta8eknynegqttz5c3

hex

6ed49db839f96737f0ecb6f8a60e4c11926ea110b685ca9f1e712b4a8f06a65a

nevent

nevent1qqsxa4yahquljeeh7rktd79xpexprynw5ygtdpw2nu08z2623ur2vksprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsrc2zasv9lgvcnttnpcusmw5xwzxh9ktscwufd0gt347numfjfu5qyf4xh0

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-06-21T20:31:25Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

95d1e055eb16d9d396c905a020fe2ee9db79a3cd70594639841a67e272296c00...

I enjoyed Jack's talk, albeit he left a lot unsaid and some things don't click correctly to me in his speech.

About your post above, I think there's a nice idea in it!

Everything kB committed to the blockchain is physical mass and an energy requirement to supply by node runners forever. Here:

  • Monetary kBs will provide ongoing network effects for the system. tx is source for txs.

  • JPEG kBs will do nothing of the sort

So if:

  • core is rotten and they won't cede control,
  • permissiveness halts bitcoin from bitcoining in the long run that we need,

then BIP110 has to be attempted because if not, none of the problems are getting sorted and we get more anti-cypherpunk shenanigans:

  • bad covenants + suitcoiners + exchanges controlling utxo flow
  • fake L2s (KYC, surveillance and capital control)
  • ethereumization, bitvm, shitcoinery but on bitcoin

Basically compartmentalization of Bitcoin into a meek and timid crypto-asset.

I don't want that.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "6ed49db839f96737f0ecb6f8a60e4c11926ea110b685ca9f1e712b4a8f06a65a",
  "pubkey": "3c285d830bf433135ae61c721b750ce11ae5b2e187712d7a171afa7cda649e50",
  "created_at": 1782073885,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "f595644e75da142ffd2fc9d1342412c710f85700d0593a5918a9f2ff1788536a",
      "",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "95d1e055eb16d9d396c905a020fe2ee9db79a3cd70594639841a67e272296c00",
      "",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "54609048284d2a151c8df625f40c389d423ed057fcef927db88956d28e22ba03",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "e01819d64d9744343d0e81eac6cdbc37d63385cea56cf0ee470881be20504efd",
      "",
      "mention"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "I enjoyed Jack's talk, albeit he left a lot unsaid and some things don't click correctly to me in his speech.\n\nAbout your post above, I think there's a nice idea in it!\n\nEverything kB committed to the blockchain is physical mass and an energy requirement to supply by node runners forever.  Here:\n\n- Monetary kBs will provide ongoing network effects for the system. tx is source for txs.\n\n- JPEG kBs will do nothing of the sort\n\nSo if:\n- core is rotten and they won't cede control,\n- permissiveness halts bitcoin from bitcoining in the long run that we need,\n\nthen BIP110 has to be attempted because if not, none of the problems are getting sorted and we get more anti-cypherpunk shenanigans:\n- bad covenants + suitcoiners + exchanges controlling utxo flow\n- fake L2s (KYC, surveillance and capital control)\n- ethereumization, bitvm, shitcoinery but on bitcoin\n\nBasically compartmentalization of Bitcoin into a meek and timid crypto-asset.\n\nI don't want that.",
  "sig": "2e785a15d65521dacfa8fa6fa53964d4c0c91aa43ebab63940f9f48742bacc6abed96a884d29358786b8acb0ebede972b0dc17cd5fa7fda5c634af1921c8ced1"
}