That’s a fair take, but just to get this out of the way, if ...

Tauri

npub1x9q89st049pnuym57ch9kqkgzcu5dmff32wduwc4g9gnc2w3nlls8hcsg7

hex

6fb84830116c6a953e9473f9545d066a2a16748856f7de7263b3a83f48300652

nevent

nevent1qqsxlwzgxqgkc65486288725t5rx52skwjy9da77wf3m82plfqcqv5sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsrzsrjc9h6jse7zd60vtjmqtypvw2xa55c48x78v25z5fu98gellcz82lky

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-06-23T07:08:07Z

That’s a fair take, but just to get this out of the way, if it comes to this (meaning BIP-110 fails and the only solution left is a hard fork change of SHA-256), I’m not supporting that and will simply disconnect my node and sell my Bitcoin. I don’t think there’s any merit in discussing hard forks, since we know they are a non-starter. We didn’t avoid them like the plague for 17 years just to pivot now. In fact I think even discussing them at this point is eroding the case for BIP-110 and giving higher ground for the bad actors. Sorry nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk and nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4spremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef03j9hac, but if you search deeper, you’ll see that I’m right. We better make BIP-110 successful or we’re all screwed and Bitcoin will die. https://blossom.primal.net/41a6d30eb027f793121a285c77ce8ab67301be03d249e3f7789f639233f64c47.jpg

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "6fb84830116c6a953e9473f9545d066a2a16748856f7de7263b3a83f48300652",
  "pubkey": "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
  "created_at": 1782198487,
  "tags": [
    [
      "p",
      "74ffc51cc30150cf79b6cb316d3a15cf332ab29a38fec9eb484ab1551d6d1856",
      "wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "fdd5e8f6ae0db817be0b71da20498c1806968d8a6459559c249f322fa73464a7",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "imeta",
      "url https://blossom.primal.net/41a6d30eb027f793121a285c77ce8ab67301be03d249e3f7789f639233f64c47.jpg",
      "m jpeg",
      "dim 1284.0x1461.0"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "That’s a fair take, but just to get this out of the way, if it comes to this (meaning BIP-110 fails and the only solution left is a hard fork change of SHA-256), I’m not supporting that and will simply disconnect my node and sell my Bitcoin. I don’t think there’s any merit in discussing hard forks, since we know they are a non-starter. We didn’t avoid them like the plague for 17 years just to pivot now. In fact I think even discussing them at this point is eroding the case for BIP-110 and giving higher ground for the bad actors. Sorry nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk and nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4spremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef03j9hac, but if you search deeper, you’ll see that I’m right. We better make BIP-110 successful or we’re all screwed and Bitcoin will die.\nhttps://blossom.primal.net/41a6d30eb027f793121a285c77ce8ab67301be03d249e3f7789f639233f64c47.jpg",
  "sig": "1f7dc86bfd5547edb6387b9f765ea12f4f99c72059be4b95a848ce987b9ba6ad5a7fadff47718433f181c26ae78b0ea1828b60cce2281011a0ee7ac29d591332"
}